The John Barry Seven, James Bond Theme (1962)

It’s inter­est­ing that James Bond theme songs are remark­ably recog­nis­able as such. They share cer­tain styl­is­tic ele­ments and motifs that clear­ly sig­nal their asso­ci­a­tion with the famous fran­chise, and it’s all thanks to the involve­ment of one son-of-York, John Bar­ry, who was by far the biggest con­trib­u­tor to Bond scores and theme songs. Of all the Bond themes, the first and most famous – and the one then reg­u­lar­ly used in sub­se­quent films — is that writ­ten for Dr No in 1962. The orig­i­nal score was actu­al­ly com­posed by Mon­ty Nor­man (though this was dis­put­ed by John Bar­ry) but most notably arranged and per­formed by John Bar­ry and his orches­tra.

The score was a mas­ter­piece of expres­sive film music and estab­lished a clear tem­plate for the quin­tes­sen­tial Bond theme: unnerv­ing orches­tral chords, raunchy brass, clash­ing cym­bals and of course that zesty surf rock gui­tar played by Vic Flick. Flick played his famous riff on a 1939 Clif­ford Essex Paragon Deluxe elec­tric gui­tar plugged into a Fend­er Vibrolux ampli­fi­er. Its inter­play with the orches­tral instru­men­ta­tion pro­duced a thrilling sound­track that man­aged to encom­pass and express the sin­is­ter world of the spy, just per­fect for the new film. The song ends just as thrilling­ly on that sin­gle Em/maj9 chord so famous it’s known as the “James Bond chord”. If you’re a gui­tarist, you might find it fun to repro­duce this final chord yourself…it’s this:

Bar­ry went on to score ten more Bond films, but this orig­i­nal score is the one that every­one instant­ly recog­nis­es as the Bond theme. Here’s the ver­sion record­ed for sin­gle release by the John Bar­ry Sev­en, reach­ing num­ber one on 1st Novem­ber 1962.

 

Peter Cook and Dudley Moore perform Pete and Dud at the Zoo (1966)

Monot­o­n­al cod philoso­pher Pete and def­er­en­tial side­kick Dud deliv­er an arche­typ­al dia­logue in the rep­tile house at the zoo. This is one of the so-called “Dagen­ham dia­logues”, fea­tur­ing “Pete and Dud”, pop­u­larised on the show Not Only…But Also, first aired in 1965.

Com­ing out of the heady icon­o­clas­tic suc­cess of the satir­i­cal stage revue, Beyond the Fringe, Dud­ley Moore embarked on what was orig­i­nal­ly intend­ed to be a solo project, Not Only Dud­ley Moore, But Also His Guests. How­ev­er, hav­ing invit­ed Peter Cook to appear with him in the pilot, the suc­cess of their dou­ble act quick­ly led to Cook join­ing the show per­ma­nent­ly.

The dia­logues between the flat-capped com­e­dy cre­ations from Dagen­ham pre­sent­ed Peter Cook with the oppor­tu­ni­ty to ad-lib and cre­ative­ly explore the myr­i­ad com­ic pos­si­bil­i­ties of his char­ac­ter. His abil­i­ty to sus­tain long peri­ods of straight-faced com­ic ram­blings that often­times bring Moore to the brink of corps­ing hilar­i­ty, adds a won­der­ful com­ic ten­sion to the dia­logues. Ever alert to Moore’s strug­gle to stay in char­ac­ter, Cook enjoys ramp­ing up the com­ic sur­re­al­i­ty in order to crack Dud up.

The duo’s rela­tion­ship was always a bit edgy, but their part­ner­ship fell apart dur­ing the marathon tour of their two-man show Behind the Fridge, in the ear­ly sev­en­ties, and they nev­er worked togeth­er on a reg­u­lar basis again, save for some albums and shows fea­tur­ing the less-than-edi­fy­ing “Derek and Clive” char­ac­ters. A flawed bro­mance they may have been but it’s prefer­able to remem­ber the good times, and at times those good times were comed­ical­ly sub­lime.

Cook and Moore

Kenneth Branagh’s St Crispin’s Day Speech, Shakespeare’s Henry V (1989)

The Hun­dred Years’ War (1337–1453) was a series of wars between Eng­land and France involv­ing England’s claim to the French throne. In the cam­paign of 1415, England’s Hen­ry V sailed for France and besieged the fortress at Harfleur, cap­tur­ing it in Sep­tem­ber. The Eng­lish army then marched across the French coun­try­side towards Calais, only to be inter­cept­ed by the French army near the vil­lage of Azin­court. Henry’s troops were exhaust­ed, hun­gry, sick, demor­alised, and pitiably out­num­bered (accord­ing to some esti­mates, by some 36000 to 9000 troops).

It didn’t look good. Hen­ry need­ed to rouse his men for bat­tle like nev­er before, and he gave them a speech which not only roused them, but spurred them to a vic­to­ry that would resound through­out the ages as the famous Bat­tle of Agin­court. It was the morn­ing of Octo­ber 25th (St Crispin’s Day).

That Henry’s speech occurred is agreed by his­to­ri­ans to be a fac­tu­al event. How­ev­er, it was left to the cre­ative imag­i­na­tion of William Shake­speare, two hun­dred years lat­er, to envis­age Henry’s words and com­pose the über-gal­vanis­ing “St Crispin’s Day Speech” that has come down to us in his play, Hen­ry V.

What a speech! If any­thing could get you up and off to face the French, it’s sure­ly inspi­ra­tional words such as these:

We few, we hap­py few, we band of broth­ers;
For he today who sheds his blood with me
Shall be my broth­er…
…gen­tle­men in Eng­land now a‑bed
Shall think them­selves accurs’d they were not here
And hold their man­hoods cheap…

Lau­rence Olivi­er famous­ly deliv­ered this call to arms in the 1944 film of the play, made as a morale-boost­er for the war effort. How­ev­er, for me there is no bet­ter deliv­ery than this mes­meris­ing per­for­mance by Ken­neth Branagh in the 1989 ver­sion. Watch this, and allow your­self to be fired up, but please resist the temp­ta­tion to hit a French­man!

PS almost cer­tain­ly apoc­ryphal, but a great sto­ry nonethe­less, is the claim that, in the real life speech, Hen­ry V told his men that the French had boast­ed that they would cut off two fin­gers from the right hand of every archer, so that he could nev­er draw a long­bow again. After the bat­tle, Eng­lish archers were show­ing French cap­tives those fin­gers as if say­ing “See – my fin­gers are still here”. This is now known as the “V” for vic­to­ry ges­ture!

Ken­neth Branagh, Hen­ry V

G K Chesterton’s The Man Who Was Thursday (1908)

G K Chester­ton is best known for his series of quirky sto­ries about ama­teur sleuth and Roman Catholic priest, Father Brown. How­ev­er, it is his 1908 nov­el The Man Who Was Thurs­day which is for me his abid­ing mas­ter­piece, a piece of lit­er­a­ture I have returned to per­haps five or six times in order to recap­ture its deli­cious prose and oth­er­world­li­ness. I even put this old and won­der­ful­ly designed book cov­er onto a T‑shirt!

 At first glance, The Man Who Was Thurs­day is a sus­pense­ful mys­tery sto­ry, a thriller, but it soon becomes appar­ent that this is no mere detec­tive sto­ry; lit­tle is as it seems in this mys­tery, and we find our­selves in deep­er waters than expect­ed. The nov­el­’s sub­ti­tle offers us a clue to this: A Night­mare.

Gabriel Syme is a poet and a police detec­tive; Lucien Gre­go­ry, a poet and bomb-throw­ing anar­chist. At the begin­ning of the nov­el, Syme infil­trates a secret meet­ing of anar­chists and gets him­self elect­ed to it as “Thurs­day,” one of the sev­en mem­bers of the Cen­tral Anar­chist Coun­cil, in the sud­den full knowl­edge of a ham­strung and pet­ri­fied Gre­go­ry.

Syme soon learns, how­ev­er, that he is not the only one in dis­guise, and even as the masks come off, the biggest ques­tion – for both the read­er and the char­ac­ters – is who is Sun­day? What is the true iden­ti­ty of the larg­er than life char­ac­ter who is the supreme head of the anar­chists? The sto­ry unfolds thrilling­ly, and through­out it all we are treat­ed to Chesterton’s exu­ber­ant prose, clever dia­logue and grip­ping style. His wit shines through every scene.

Let’s read an exam­ple of this style, and how Chester­ton con­structs a creep­ing sense of jeop­ardy. Syme, the detec­tive who is dis­guised as a poet, has engaged the anar­chist Gre­go­ry and, on con­di­tion of hav­ing sworn him­self to absolute secre­cy, is tak­en to meet the high­ly dan­ger­ous anar­chist coun­cil. Just pri­or to the arrival of the rest of the anar­chists, Syme lets Gre­go­ry into his own secret…

“Gre­go­ry, I gave you a promise before I came into this place. That promise I would keep under red-hot pin­cers. Would you give me, for my own safe­ty, a lit­tle promise of the same kind?”

“A promise?” asked Gre­go­ry, won­der­ing.

“Yes,” said Syme, very seri­ous­ly, “a promise. I swore before God that I would not tell your secret to the police. Will you swear by Human­i­ty, or what­ev­er beast­ly thing you believe in, that you will not tell my secret to the anar­chists?”

“Your secret?” asked the star­ing Gre­go­ry. “Have you got a secret?”

“Yes,” said Syme, “I have a secret.” Then after a pause, “Will you swear?”

Gre­go­ry glared at him grave­ly for a few moments, and then said abrupt­ly—

“You must have bewitched me, but I feel a furi­ous curios­i­ty about you. Yes, I will swear not to tell the anar­chists any­thing you tell me. But look sharp, for they will be here in a cou­ple of min­utes.”

Syme rose slow­ly to his feet and thrust his long, white hands into his long, grey trousers’ pock­ets. Almost as he did so there came five knocks on the out­er grat­ing, pro­claim­ing the arrival of the first of the con­spir­a­tors.

“Well,” said Syme slow­ly, “I don’t know how to tell you the truth more short­ly than by say­ing that your expe­di­ent of dress­ing up as an aim­less poet is not con­fined to you or your Pres­i­dent. We have known the dodge for some time at Scot­land Yard.”

Gre­go­ry tried to spring up straight, but he swayed thrice.

“What do you say?” he asked in an inhu­man voice.

“Yes,” said Syme sim­ply, “I am a police detec­tive. But I think I hear your friends com­ing.”

G K Chesterton
G K Chester­ton