John Keats’ Ode, To Autumn (1819)

Autumn is in the air, a sign that is wel­comed in my house­hold, and one which trig­gers a swap­ping out of cush­ions and can­dles for ones befit­ting the sea­son. Autum­nal colours and aro­mas abound. My week­end walk was cool­er and cloudi­er but the hedgerows were still full of late-fruit­ing black­ber­ries, and the walk brought to mind that famous open­ing line of John Keats’ poem On Autumn, “Sea­son of mists and mel­low fruit­ful­ness”. Let’s talk about Keats…

Along with Shel­ley and Byron, Keats is the clas­sic exem­plar of the arche­typ­al Roman­tic poet, the fay, tor­tured genius. In Keats’ case, he was also con­sump­tive and short-lived, dying at 25 and thus – a bit like the 27 club of the mod­ern era — being con­ferred ever­last­ing leg­endary sta­tus. He trained to be a doc­tor and worked at Guy’s Hos­pi­tal in Lon­don, but he had long resolved to become a poet and so spent more and more time devot­ed to the study of lit­er­a­ture and the pen­ning of lines of poet­ry.

Although he wrote epics, son­nets and ele­gies, Keats’ most famous and well-regard­ed poems were his odes, writ­ten in quick suc­ces­sion dur­ing an extra­or­di­nary spell of cre­ativ­i­ty in 1819, at his friend Charles Armitage Brown’s house, Went­worth Place on Hamp­stead Heath. He wrote Ode on a Gre­cian Urn, Ode on Indo­lence, Ode on Melan­choly, Ode to a Nightin­gale, and Ode to Psy­che dur­ing the spring, and final­ly, despite wors­en­ing health and loom­ing finan­cial woes, To Autumn in Sep­tem­ber. This was to be his last major work before tuber­cu­lo­sis brought the cur­tain down on his career.

After his stay with Brown, Keats moved to Italy, seek­ing a more salu­bri­ous cli­mate to aid in his recov­ery, but it wasn’t to be. I have vis­it­ed the small room in the house by the Span­ish Steps in Rome, in which Keats spent his last days. He died on the 23rd Feb­ru­ary 1821, and is buried in the city’s Protes­tant ceme­tery (as is his good friend Shel­ley).

Keats’ House, by the Span­ish Steps, Rome

He was con­vinced that he had made no mark in his life­time and in Feb­ru­ary 1820, when he knew that he was dying, he wrote: “I have left no immor­tal work behind me – noth­ing to make my friends proud of my mem­o­ry – but I have lov’d the prin­ci­ple of beau­ty in all things, and if I had had time I would have made myself remem­ber’d”. Lit­tle did he know that he would indeed be remem­bered to pos­ter­i­ty, more per­haps than he could ever have imag­ined — peo­ple like me, after all, are still writ­ing about him over two hun­dred years lat­er!

Sea­son of mists and mel­low fruit­ful­ness,
Close bosom-friend of the matur­ing sun;
Con­spir­ing with him how to load and bless
With fruit the vines that round the thatch-eves run;
To bend with apples the moss’d cot­tage-trees,
And fill all fruit with ripeness to the core;
To swell the gourd, and plump the hazel shells
With a sweet ker­nel; to set bud­ding more,
And still more, lat­er flow­ers for the bees,
Until they think warm days will nev­er cease,
For sum­mer has o’er-brim­m’d their clam­my cells.

Who hath not seen thee oft amid thy store?
Some­times who­ev­er seeks abroad may find
Thee sit­ting care­less on a gra­nary floor,
Thy hair soft-lift­ed by the win­now­ing wind;
Or on a half-reap’d fur­row sound asleep,
Drows’d with the fume of pop­pies, while thy hook
Spares the next swath and all its twined flow­ers:
And some­times like a glean­er thou dost keep
Steady thy laden head across a brook;
Or by a cyder-press, with patient look,
Thou watch­est the last ooz­ings hours by hours.

Where are the songs of spring? Ay, Where are they?
Think not of them, thou hast thy music too,—
While barred clouds bloom the soft-dying day,
And touch the stub­ble-plains with rosy hue;
Then in a wail­ful choir the small gnats mourn
Among the riv­er sal­lows, borne aloft
Or sink­ing as the light wind lives or dies;
And full-grown lambs loud bleat from hilly bourn;
Hedge-crick­ets sing; and now with tre­ble soft
The red-breast whis­tles from a gar­den-croft;
And gath­er­ing swal­lows twit­ter in the skies.

John Keats

 

Sidney Lumet’s 12 Angry Men (1957)

Clas­sics night at Cot­tage Road cin­e­ma is prov­ing to be the gift that keeps on giv­ing! Just as the dust set­tles on my recent blog about Bad Day at Black Rock, this month’s fea­ture com­pelled me to write about anoth­er clas­sic from the fifties, Sid­ney Lumet’s legal dra­ma 12 Angry Men (1957). The film was Sid­ney Lumet’s direc­to­r­i­al debut, so not a bad start giv­en that it’s regard­ed by many as one of the great­est films of all time and that he was nom­i­nat­ed for Best Direc­tor at the Acad­e­my Awards (he would go on to be nom­i­nat­ed for three oth­er films, Dog Day After­noon (1975), the satir­i­cal dra­ma Net­work (1976) and the legal thriller The Ver­dict (1982)).

12 Angry Men was adapt­ed from a 1954 tele­play of the same name by Regi­nald Rose and tells the sto­ry of a jury of twelve men as they delib­er­ate over whether the teenag­er that they have just seen charged with the mur­der of his father should be con­vict­ed or acquit­ted on the basis of rea­son­able doubt. As they troop into the jurors’ room it soon becomes clear that they all regard the case as open-and-shut: the accused is clear­ly guilty. They antic­i­pate a quick unan­i­mous agree­ment to a ‘guilty’ ver­dict after which they can return to their lives. How­ev­er, when they con­duct a pre­lim­i­nary tal­ly of the jurors’ posi­tions and the ‘guilty’ votes pile in, they are some­what irri­tat­ed to find that the twelfth man, played bril­liant­ly by Hen­ry Fon­da, can­not in good con­science vote guilty. What ensues is a tour de force of psy­chodra­ma as every man is forced to ques­tion his morals, val­ues and assump­tions.

Almost the entire film is shot in the jurors’ room in which they are ensconced. It’s a hot summer’s night, the heat is sweat-induc­ing, the fan isn’t work­ing, and most of the chaps are smok­ing, and it all adds to the claus­tro­pho­bic, sti­fling ten­sion of the scene. Fonda’s char­ac­ter, Juror 8, begins to calm­ly dis­man­tle the assump­tions that his co-jurors have so read­i­ly accept­ed. He out­lines alter­na­tive fea­si­ble sce­nar­ios to the ones pressed by the pros­e­cu­tion and remains adamant that rea­son­able doubt exists. His argu­ments don’t at first find favour, but grad­u­al­ly, one by one, the oth­er jurors come around to his point of view.

There’s some great act­ing tal­ent on dis­play here, with ter­rif­ic per­for­mances from Mar­tin Bal­sam, Ed Beg­ley, Jack Klug­man, Jack War­den, and Lee J Cobb. The dia­logue is elec­tric and the cin­e­matog­ra­phy is in the real­ist style cour­tesy of Boris Kauf­man who had recent­ly won an Acad­e­my Award for On The Water­front. The cam­era work con­tributes to the claus­tro­pho­bia by grad­u­al­ly increas­ing the focal length as the film pro­gress­es, going from above eye-lev­el, wide-angle lens at the begin­ning to low­er angle, tele­pho­to lens close-ups at the end.

Let’s watch juror 3, the hot-tem­pered and most pas­sion­ate advo­cate of a ‘guilty ver­dict’, played mes­mer­iz­ing­ly by Lee J Cobb, as his defi­ance as last man stand­ing final­ly crum­bles.

Hen­ry Fon­da as Juror 8
Sid­ney Lumet