J M W Turner’s The Fighting Temeraire (1839)

J M W Turn­er is famed for his mas­tery of light and colour. For him, as for Mon­et, light was a mirac­u­lous phe­nom­e­non — it pro­duced colour, it sculpt­ed form and mood and it revealed the beau­ty of nature. He was also remark­ably pro­lif­ic, leav­ing some 550 oil paint­ings and 2,000 water­colours (as well as about 30,000 sketch­es), so you don’t have to go out of your way in this coun­try to find a Turn­er. He was a keen trav­eller, and I love the fact that he came to York­shire and paint­ed such famil­iar land­marks (to us) as Hardraw Force, Mal­ham Cove, and Hare­wood House. Indeed, the Tate holds six full sketch­books from Turner’s tour of York­shire in 1816.

How­ev­er, the sub­ject of this blog is set not in York­shire but on the Thames riv­er. This paint­ing by Turn­er, The Fight­ing Temeraire, on dis­play in the Nation­al Gallery, depicts the last jour­ney of the HMS Temeraire. The Temeraire had been a cel­e­brat­ed gun­ship that had fought valiant­ly in Lord Nel­son’s fleet at the bat­tle of Trafal­gar in 1805. Indeed, pri­or to that bat­tle, she had been mere­ly the Temeraire; it was after­wards she was hon­oured with the “Fight­ing” sobri­quet. Thir­ty three years lat­er, how­ev­er, decay­ing and well past her glo­ry days, she was towed up the Thames from Sheer­ness to be bro­ken up in a Rother­hithe ship­yard.

Turn­er’s paint­ing pays trib­ute to the Temeraire’s hero­ic past. The glo­ri­ous sun­set is a fan­fare of colour in her hon­our. Paint is laid on thick­ly to ren­der the sun’s rays strik­ing the clouds, whilst by con­trast, the ship’s rig­ging is metic­u­lous­ly paint­ed. It can be seen as a sym­bol of the end of an era, even the decline of Britain’s naval pow­er, with the sun set­ting on the days of ele­gant, tall-mast­ed war­ships. The Temeraire is already phan­tas­mal, behind the more sol­id form of the squat lit­tle steam tug that pulls her along to her fate.

Turn­er was in his six­ties when he paint­ed The Fight­ing Temeraire; per­haps this was behind his think­ing in terms of the end of an era. In any event, the paint­ing is an arrest­ing piece of work and, dis­tinct from Turn­er’s many strict­ly-land­scape paint­ings, it tells a sto­ry. I love it.

 

The HAL 9000 Scene in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

There’s been a lot of talk in the media recent­ly about Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence (AI). Face­book uses it for tar­get­ed adver­tis­ing, pho­to tag­ging, and news feeds. Microsoft and Apple use it to pow­er their dig­i­tal assis­tants, Cor­tana and Siri, and Google’s search engine has utilised AI from the begin­ning. There appears to be some­thing of a chase to cre­ate flex­i­ble, self-teach­ing AI that will mir­ror human learn­ing and appar­ent­ly trans­form our lives.

There have been some big-name doom-mon­gers on this sub­ject, how­ev­er. Elon Musk thinks AI is prob­a­bly humanity’s “biggest exis­ten­tial threat”. Stephen Hawk­ing fears that AI may “replace humans alto­geth­er”. Bill Gates agrees with both of them. Me, I’m not so sure; sure­ly you can always turn a machine off?…(on the oth­er hand, have you ever tried clos­ing Skype?)

This con­cept of computers/machines gone bad is a well-worn theme in sci­ence fic­tion, with the Ter­mi­na­tor series of films an obvi­ous exam­ple, but it was back in 1968, in Stan­ley Kubrik and Arthur C Clarke’s sem­i­nal 2001: A Space Odyssey, that we were intro­duced to our first elec­tron­ic wrong ‘un, HAL 9000. HAL (from Heuris­ti­cal­ly pro­grammed ALgorithm, appar­ent­ly, though some have con­jec­tured an eas­i­ly-decrypt­ed code ver­sion of IBM) is a sen­tient com­put­er con­trol­ling the sys­tems of the Dis­cov­ery One space­craft on its mis­sion to Jupiter.

HAL is ini­tial­ly regard­ed as anoth­er mem­ber of the crew, engag­ing genial­ly with its human col­leagues, play­ing chess with them and so on. How­ev­er, he begins to mal­func­tion in sub­tle ways. As the mal­func­tion­ing dete­ri­o­rates, the crew mem­bers dis­cuss the pos­si­bil­i­ty of dis­con­nect­ing HAL’s cog­ni­tive cir­cuits. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, HAL can read lips and dis­cerns their plan, and his pro­grammed direc­tives to pro­tect the mis­sion lead him to rea­son that he must kill the astro­nauts. In this clas­sic scene, crew mem­ber Dave Bow­man is out­side the main craft in a “pod” and is seek­ing re-entry, ask­ing HAL to open the pod bay doors. HAL (voiced chill­ing­ly by Dou­glas Rain) isn’t play­ing ball…

W B Yeats’ The Lake Isle of Innisfree (1888)

Ten years ago, Sal and I had a week­end break in Knock in Coun­ty Mayo, Ire­land, dur­ing which we took a pleas­ant side trip to Sli­go and “Yeats coun­try”. In those days I was into “col­lect­ing” lit­er­ary graves and we took the oppor­tu­ni­ty to vis­it Yeats’ final rest­ing place, which turned out to be sit­u­at­ed in a glo­ri­ous set­ting at Drum­cliff, under the impos­ing Ben­bul­bin rock for­ma­tion. William But­ler Yeats was of course one of the fore­most twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry Eng­lish lan­guage poets, and in Sli­go they’re right­ly proud of him.

Ben­bul­ben

I con­fess to not hav­ing read much Yeats, but there are two of his poems in par­tic­u­lar that have res­onat­ed with me from old. One is his evoca­tive ren­der­ing of the Greek myth, Leda and the Swan, and the oth­er is this, the twelve-line lyric poem, The Lake Isle of Inn­is­free.

Yeats wrote The Lake Isle of Inn­is­free in 1888 when he was a young man, liv­ing in Lon­don and feel­ing lone­ly and home­sick. The 1880s had seen the rise of Charles Stew­art Par­nell and the home rule move­ment in Ire­land and devel­op­ments there had had a pro­found effect on Yeats’ poet­ry, informed by his sub­se­quent explo­rations of Irish iden­ti­ty. The Lake Isle of Inn­is­free is about a yearn­ing for his child­hood home (the isle of Inn­is­free is a real place, an unin­hab­it­ed island in Lough Gill, where Yeats spent many of his child­hood sum­mers). It is a place of seren­i­ty and sim­plic­i­ty, and to we, the read­er, that place becomes not Inn­is­free, but wher­ev­er we hap­pen to pic­ture our own rur­al hide­away; the place to which we pre­tend we shall one day escape and leave behind our cur­rent man­ic, urban lives (“on the pave­ment grey”).

The Lake Isle rep­re­sents an escape, a poet­’s vision of a roman­tic, idyl­lic, and time­less way of life. I love the way he evokes the tran­quil life, in the bosom of nature, in that mas­ter­ful­ly sim­ple phrase where­in he says he will “live alone in the bee-loud glade”. How effec­tive­ly this con­jures up a pic­ture of a hot sun­ny day alive with the hum of insects!

Of course, such an ambi­tion rarely comes to pass and it remains for most of us a fan­ci­ful idea. Indeed, Yeats died in France and only returned to Sli­go in a cof­fin. But his poem remains a great favourite with the Irish (it’s quot­ed in Irish pass­ports) and to roman­tics every­where who yearn for tran­quil­li­ty and “hear it in the deep heart’s core”.

I will arise and go now, and go to Inn­is­free,
And a small cab­in build there, of clay and wat­tles made;
Nine bean rows will I have there, a hive for the hon­ey bee,
And live alone in the bee-loud glade.

And I shall have some peace there, for peace comes drop­ping slow,
Drop­ping from the veils of the morn­ing to where the crick­et sings;
There mid­night’s all a glim­mer, and noon a pur­ple glow,
And evening full of the lin­net’s wings.

I will arise and go now, for always night and day
I hear lake water lap­ping with low sounds by the shore;
While I stand on the road­way, or on the pave­ments grey,
I hear it in the deep heart’s core.

 

William But­ler Yeats

The Glenn Miller Orchestra plays In The Mood (1939)

In this blog, I have writ­ten about both Elvis Pres­ley and the Bea­t­les, but before them, in an extra­or­di­nary four year peri­od between 1938 and 1942, there was a man who scored 23 num­ber-one hits in the US: band­leader and icon of the swing era, Glenn Miller. Miller was per­haps an unlike­ly star and cer­tain­ly a reluc­tant one, as he shied away from the spot­light and hat­ed per­son­al appear­ances, but he nonethe­less had such an ear for melody and such keen arrang­ing skills that most of his out­put became clas­sics of the age – think Moon­light Ser­e­nade, Penn­syl­va­nia 6–5000, Tuxe­do Junc­tion, Chat­tanooga Choo Choo, and of course In the Mood, one of the best dance songs to emerge from the peri­od and the one big band song that gave the swing era its defin­ing moment.

Miller had cut his teeth as a free­lance trom­bon­ist in a vari­ety of bands in the late 1920s and ear­ly 1930s, and worked as a com­pos­er and arranger for the Dorsey broth­ers. He had put an orches­tra togeth­er for British band­leader Ray Noble in 1935, and in 1937 formed his first band, but this proved short-lived after fail­ing to dis­tin­guish itself from the pletho­ra of rival bands. Miller knew that he need­ed a unique sound and in 1938 he put togeth­er an arrange­ment with the clar­inet play­ing a melod­ic line with a tenor sax­o­phone hold­ing the same note, while three oth­er sax­o­phones har­monised with­in a sin­gle octave. It soon became the basis of the “Miller sound”, the tem­plate for what big band music would sound like.

In the Mood is based on an old jazz riff that had been passed around in var­i­ous incar­na­tions for many a year. It was a fel­low named Joe Gar­land who cre­at­ed a new arrange­ment for the riff with the title of “In the Mood”, but it was Miller who pared the tune down to its bare essen­tials. Released in Sep­tem­ber 1939, the tune went on to top the charts in the US for thir­teen straight weeks. With its famous intro­duc­tion fea­tur­ing the sax­o­phones in uni­son, the catchy riff anchor­ing the tune, the two solos (a “tenor fight” between sax­o­phon­ists Tex Beneke and Al Klink, and a 16-bar trum­pet solo by Clyde Hur­ley), and the sus­pense-build­ing end­ing, it has all the Miller spe­cial­i­ties. A true mod­el of sus­pense and dynam­ics. Here it is as fea­tured in the 1941 movie Sun Val­ley Ser­e­nade.

 

Glenn Miller
Glenn Miller

Pieter Bruegel the Elder’s Census at Bethlehem (1566)

Last Sun­day, my fam­i­ly and I attend­ed a Christ­mas car­ol ser­vice at our local church, resplen­dent, as every year, with can­dle­light and sea­son­al good­will. As well as the age-old car­ols that we all know and love (or at least tol­er­ate fond­ly, after the decades of rep­e­ti­tion), there were of course sev­er­al appo­site read­ings, and it is the one below, from Luke 2:1–5, that inspired the sub­ject of today’s blog.

And it came to pass in those days that a decree went out from Cae­sar Augus­tus that all the world should be reg­is­tered… So all went to be reg­is­tered, every­one to his own city. Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judea, to the city of David, which is called Beth­le­hem, because he was of the house and lin­eage of David, to be reg­is­tered with Mary, his betrothed wife, who was with child.

This of course refers to the cen­sus at Beth­le­hem, and the scene was depict­ed won­der­ful­ly well (albeit set anachro­nis­ti­cal­ly and anatopis­ti­cal­ly in 16th cen­tu­ry Flan­ders) in this 1566 oil paint­ing by one of my favourite artists, Pieter Bruegel the Elder. As is usu­al with works by this Nether­lan­dish Renais­sance mas­ter, much plea­sure is derived from view­ing the piece up close and dis­cov­er­ing the mul­ti­tude of details.

We are look­ing down on a snow-cov­ered vil­lage (and indeed this is one of the first exam­ples of snowy land­scape in West­ern art, the pre­vi­ous win­ter of 1565 hav­ing been, not unco­in­ci­den­tal­ly, one of the harsh­est on record). Peo­ple are going about their dai­ly busi­ness: clear­ing the snow, cross­ing the frozen pond, warm­ing them­selves around a fire. The chil­dren are throw­ing snow­balls, skat­ing, sledg­ing, spin­ning tops. In the right hand fore­ground, we see a man with a large car­pen­ter’s saw, lead­ing an ox and an ass, on which rides a woman wrapped up tight­ly against the cold. These are of course none oth­er than Joseph and Mary, who have come to Beth­le­hem to be enrolled in the uni­ver­sal cen­sus ordered by Emper­or Augus­tus.

With a few deft brush­strokes Bruegel bril­liant­ly cap­tures vil­lage life, whilst sub­tly depict­ing the scene just pri­or to the nativ­i­ty (since after reg­is­ter­ing, there was, of course, no room at the inn). I could spend ages glimps­ing new details revealed in Bruegel’s works, and indeed have done on sev­er­al occa­sions in var­i­ous gal­leries of Europe, where I have usu­al­ly been left to it, meet­ing my long-suf­fer­ing fam­i­ly lat­er in the gift shop! Fun­ni­ly enough, this piece I have yet to actu­al­ly see (it’s in Brus­sels’ Musée des Beaux Arts, which is still only “on the list”).

 

Wilfrid Owen’s Dulce et Decorum Est (1917)

“Who’s for the game?”

“Who’s for the trench – Are you, my lad­die?”

These are words from poems by Jessie Pope, poet and pro­pa­gan­dist well-known for her patri­ot­ic and moti­va­tion­al poet­ry that was orig­i­nal­ly pub­lished in the Dai­ly Mail to encour­age enlist­ment at the begin­ning of the Great War. Anoth­er poem renowned for express­ing the patri­ot­ic ideals that char­ac­terised pre-war Eng­land was Rupert Brooke’s The Sol­dier, a son­net in which Brooke speaks in the guise of an Eng­lish sol­dier as he is leav­ing home to go to the Great War. It por­trays death for one’s coun­try as a noble end and Eng­land as the noblest coun­try for which to die:

If I should die, think only this of me:
That there’s some cor­ner of a for­eign field
That is for ever Eng­land

Or, as the Roman lyri­cal poet, Horace, had it in his Odes: Dulce et deco­rum est pro patria mori (How sweet and hon­ourable it is to die for one’s coun­try).

Lat­er, how­ev­er, when the grim real­i­ties of the war had set in, Wil­frid Owen chose to express in his poet­ry a very dif­fer­ent kind of sen­ti­ment, and when he wrote this poem whilst recov­er­ing from shell-shock in a hos­pi­tal near Edin­burgh in 1917, he bor­rowed from Horace’s phrase for his title: Dulce et deco­rum est.

No jin­go­ism here, no rose-tint­ed roman­ti­cism nor noble ideals. This poem speaks instead from Owen’s direct expe­ri­ence; a vignette from the trench­es, where the grue­some effects of a chlo­rine gas attack are described in com­pelling detail. It makes for grim read­ing. Wil­frid Owen, who ded­i­cat­ed this poem to Jessie Pope her­self (I won­der how that went down?), at least pro­vides us with an artistry of words in this descrip­tion of the hor­ror of the front line. But he reminds us that, were we to expe­ri­ence first-hand the real­i­ty of war, we may hes­i­tate to repeat plat­i­tudes such as Horace’s “old Lie”.

DULCE ET DECORUM EST

Bent dou­ble, like old beg­gars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, cough­ing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunt­ing flares we turned our backs
And towards our dis­tant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of gas-shells drop­ping soft­ly behind.

Gas! GAS! Quick, boys!—An ecsta­sy of fum­bling
Fit­ting the clum­sy hel­mets just in time,
But some­one still was yelling out and stum­bling
And floun­d’ring like a man in fire or lime.—
Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drown­ing.

In all my dreams before my help­less sight
He plunges at me, gut­ter­ing, chok­ing, drown­ing.

If in some smoth­er­ing dreams you too could pace
Behind the wag­on that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hang­ing face, like a dev­il’s sick of sin,
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gar­gling from the froth-cor­rupt­ed lungs,
Bit­ter as the cud
Of vile, incur­able sores on inno­cent tongues,—
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To chil­dren ardent for some des­per­ate glo­ry,
The old Lie: Dulce et deco­rum est
Pro patria mori
.

 

Wil­frid Owen

Mozart’s Piano Concerto no. 21, Elvira Madigan (1785)

In the course of lunch recent­ly, my good friend and sub­scriber to this blog, Jason, sug­gest­ed that I do a piece on one of his favourite pieces of music, Mozart’s Piano Con­cer­to no. 21, the “Elvi­ra Madi­gan” con­cer­to. “You’ll know it” he said, when I con­ced­ed that I couldn’t bring it to mind from its name. Upon lis­ten­ing to it lat­er, I nodded…of course, yes, I know this alright, and yes, Jase, it cer­tain­ly does qual­i­fy for an “occa­sion­al glimpse”!

The con­cer­to is in three move­ments, but it is the sec­ond move­ment, the Andante in F major, that is the well-known part we’ll high­light here. Mozart wrote the con­cer­to in 1785, in the mid­dle of a pro­lif­ic cre­ative burst in Vien­na in which he wrote no few­er than eleven mas­ter­pieces in a 24-month peri­od. It was writ­ten for one of his so-called “sub­scrip­tion con­certs”; he would hire a venue, engage some musi­cians, take all the pro­ceeds from the con­cert and hope­ful­ly make a prof­it.

I was intrigued to learn how the con­cer­to came by its nick­name, “Elvi­ra Madi­gan”. What a sto­ry it turned out to be! It is a rel­a­tive­ly recent nick­name, as it is named after the 1967 film Elvi­ra Madi­gan made by Swedish direc­tor Bo Wider­berg in which the andante was promi­nent­ly fea­tured. The film is based on the true and trag­ic love sto­ry of Dan­ish tightrope walk­er, Elvi­ra Madi­gan (the stage name of one Hed­wig Jensen) and Swedish noble­man and cav­al­ry offi­cer, Lieu­tenant Six­ten Sparre of the Scan­ian Dra­goon Reg­i­ment.

While per­form­ing in Swe­den with her step­fa­ther’s cir­cus in 1887, Elvi­ra Madi­gan met Six­ten Sparre and the two fell in love. How­ev­er, since he was a mar­ried man and from a dif­fer­ent, high­er social class, their love was doomed. After two years of exchang­ing love let­ters, they abscond­ed and holed up in a hotel in Svend­borg in Den­mark for a month. From there, 21-year old Elvi­ra and 34-year old Six­ten took the fer­ry to the near­by island of Tåsinge and stayed at a lit­tle pen­sion in the fish­ing vil­lage of Troense. When Sixten’s fam­i­ly with­held finan­cial help, the couple’s last hopes fad­ed. They went out to the for­est, had a last meal…and then com­mit­ted sui­cide with Six­ten’s ser­vice revolver.

They are buried togeth­er on Tåsinge and to this day their graves are still vis­it­ed by tourists and roman­tics from all over the world. Mozart’s emo­tion­al and dream­like melody fits their trag­ic sto­ry per­fect­ly. Take a qui­et time to expe­ri­ence the music, below, whilst perus­ing the accom­pa­ny­ing images I found of Elvi­ra, Six­ten and the places in which they spent their last days. If you remain unmoved, you may want to just check your pulse…

 

Elvi­ra and Six­ten

Steve Martin and John Candy in Planes, Trains and Automobiles (1987)

Writer/director John Hugh­es had had a series of suc­cess­ful movies in the eight­ies fea­tur­ing teenage angst and adven­tures (Weird Sci­ence, Break­fast Club, Fer­ris Bueller’s Day Off) when he embarked on this, the more grown-up movie, Planes, Trains and Auto­mo­biles. It’s a com­e­dy, and it is indeed packed with com­ic set pieces, but it’s a lot more than that: it has a gen­uine pathos and poignan­cy.

Inspired by an actu­al hell­ish trip that Hugh­es had per­son­al­ly expe­ri­enced, in which var­i­ous delays and diver­sions had kept him from get­ting home for an entire week­end, Hugh­es appar­ent­ly wrote the first six­ty pages of the script in just six hours. Steve Mar­tin plays Neal Page, a mar­ket­ing exec­u­tive des­per­ate to get back home to Chica­go to see his wife and kids for Thanks­giv­ing, and who along the way becomes sad­dled with show­er cur­tain ring sales­man Del Grif­fith (John Can­dy). Mishaps befall the two through­out their trav­els, and they endure every indig­ni­ty that mod­ern trav­el can inflict on its vic­tims.

The suc­cess of the movie is found­ed on the essen­tial natures of its two prin­ci­pal actors: Steve Mar­tin and John Can­dy embody them­selves, and this is key to why the film is able to reveal so much heart and truth. Neal spends the movie try­ing to peel off from Del, whilst Del spends the movie hav­ing his feel­ings hurt and then com­ing through for Neal any­way. It is road trip and bud­dy movie rolled into one, done to high­ly comedic effect, and my fam­i­ly returns to it time after time.

The last scenes of the movie deliv­er the emo­tion­al pay­off we have been half-expect­ing all along. Neal under­goes a kind of moral rebirth: we know he has learned a valu­able les­son about empa­thy, and there is true poignan­cy in the scene where Neal finds Del wait­ing alone on the L plat­form. Inci­den­tal­ly, there is a moment just before this scene where Neal, on the train home before he returns to find Del, starts to laugh qui­et­ly to him­self as he recalls their mis­ad­ven­tures. It’s won­der­ful­ly nat­ur­al and it turns out that there was good rea­son for that: unbe­knownst to Steve Mar­tin, Hugh­es had kept the cam­eras rolling in between takes on the Chica­go train, while Mar­tin was think­ing about his next lines, and in so doing cap­tured this unguard­ed moment. I include it, along with a few of the oth­er great scenes in the two-part mon­tage below.

 

Elvis Presley appears on the Milton Berle Show (1956)

The cul­tur­al impact of Elvis Pres­ley is hard to over­state; when he explod­ed on the scene, the whole phe­nom­e­non of youth enter­tain­ment explod­ed with him. John Lennon said: “before Elvis, there was noth­ing”. Now, whilst this might be an over-egged point, giv­en that even in the ‘40s Frank Sina­tra was inspir­ing devo­tion from teenage “Bob­by sox­ers”, nonethe­less there’s no doubt­ing the cul­tur­al par­a­digm shift that Elvis launched. His records, his look, his moves, his duck­tail quiff, his clothing…these all became embod­i­ments of the new rock ‘n’ roll style, and, with eco­nom­ic pros­per­i­ty putting more mon­ey into Amer­i­can teenagers’ pock­ets, it spread like wild­fire.

This sen­sa­tion did­n’t occur overnight, how­ev­er. By the end of 1955, Elvis had already record­ed two dozen sin­gles, but these were only hits on the Coun­try and West­ern charts, not the main Bill­board charts. That changed with his debut sin­gle for his new label, RCA Vic­tor – Heart­break Hotel. This time, Elvis did shoot to the top of the pop charts and stayed there for sev­en weeks, turn­ing him into the dar­ling of radio and record stores up and down the coun­try. It was, how­ev­er, tele­vi­sion that tru­ly made him the “King of Rock ‘n’ Roll”, and if any one appear­ance might be called his coro­na­tion, it was this appear­ance on the Mil­ton Berle Show on 5th June 1956, when he set his gui­tar aside and put his whole being into a scorch­ing and scan­dalous per­for­mance of Hound Dog.

Pre­vi­ous tele­vi­sion appear­ances had fea­tured Elvis either in close-up, singing a slow bal­lad, or of his full body but with his move­ments some­what restrict­ed by the acoustic gui­tar he was play­ing. But here, for the first time, the 21-year-old Elvis Pres­ley was seen from head to toe, gyrat­ing his soon-to-be-famous (or infa­mous) pelvis.

You can bet that the reac­tion to Elvis’ per­for­mance in the main­stream media was almost uni­form­ly neg­a­tive. The New York Dai­ly News described Presley’s per­for­mance as marked by “the kind of ani­mal­ism that should be con­fined to dives and bor­del­los”. The Jour­nal-Amer­i­can said that Elvis “can’t sing a lick and makes up for vocal short­com­ings with the weird­est sug­ges­tive ani­ma­tion short of an aborigine’s mat­ing dance”. The Catholic week­ly peri­od­i­cal, Amer­i­ca, got right to the point, mean­while, with its head­line: “Beware of Elvis Pres­ley”.

The com­plaints and con­cerns of these reac­tionar­ies, how­ev­er, was pret­ty much drowned out by the screams of young girls, and by the end of 1956, when the Wall Street Jour­nal was already com­ment­ing that “Elvis Pres­ley is today a busi­ness”, they had to accept that the times had changed.

Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace (1869)

Con­sist­ing of over half a mil­lion words, spread over 1200 plus pages of small print, and involv­ing around 600 char­ac­ters (includ­ing rough­ly 160 his­tor­i­cal fig­ures), Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace enjoys almost myth­i­cal sta­tus as the arche­typ­i­cal­ly mon­u­men­tal nov­el that most peo­ple either casu­al­ly have on their list of books to tack­le one day, or who wouldn’t dream of tak­ing on. It is one of the most famous works of lit­er­a­ture in his­to­ry and gen­er­al­ly con­sid­ered to be an absolute mas­ter­piece.

War and Peace is cer­tain­ly a chal­leng­ing read and not one to be tack­led light­ly. I came across it in a pile of sec­ond-hand books left by fel­low trav­ellers in a hotel in Peru, of all places, and realised that here was my oppor­tu­ni­ty to take it on (there must have been quite a few peo­ple over the years who have read it whilst on a gap year). Antic­i­pat­ing a slog, but not expect­ing to derive any actu­al plea­sure from it, I dived in. What a pleas­ant sur­prise! Despite some admit­ted­ly dis­tend­ed and mean­der­ing pas­sages on his­to­ri­og­ra­phy and some lengthy mil­i­tary minu­ti­ae, I found it a thrilling read. It is his­tor­i­cal nov­el, fam­i­ly chron­i­cle, and philo­soph­i­cal trea­tise, all rolled into one, cen­tred around Napoleon’s inva­sion of Rus­sia and fea­tur­ing the inter­twined lives of the Bezuhov, Bolkon­sky, Ros­tov and Kura­gin fam­i­lies.

If you want to under­stand the big pic­ture, thinks Tol­stoy, you have to exam­ine the details – which is exact­ly what he did. He stud­ied count­less man­u­scripts, let­ters, and diaries, and vis­it­ed all the sites where the bat­tles (Schön­grabern, Auster­litz, Borodi­no) took place, draw­ing maps of the area and inter­view­ing locals who had lived through the war. The nov­el is so long and detailed because he believed that that was the only way to tell this sto­ry. To do it jus­tice, the can­vas had to be broad.

So War and Peace demands patience and focus, but if you are will­ing to accept those con­di­tions, it is well worth the effort. If you’re in the mar­ket for an epic work encom­pass­ing love, war, reli­gion, fam­i­ly, class, his­to­ry, and phi­los­o­phy, you could do worse than to bump it up that “must read” list of yours.

 

Leo Tol­stoy

Commentaries on excellence in art, music, film, and literature