Steve Martin and John Candy in Planes, Trains and Automobiles (1987)

Writer/director John Hughes had had a series of successful movies in the eighties featuring teenage angst and adventures (Weird Science, Breakfast Club, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off) when he embarked on this, the more grown-up movie, Planes, Trains and Automobiles. It’s a comedy, and it is indeed packed with comic set pieces, but it’s a lot more than that: it has a genuine pathos and poignancy.

Inspired by an actual hellish trip that Hughes had personally experienced, in which various delays and diversions had kept him from getting home for an entire weekend, Hughes apparently wrote the first sixty pages of the script in just six hours. Steve Martin plays Neal Page, a marketing executive desperate to get back home to Chicago to see his wife and kids for Thanksgiving, and who along the way becomes saddled with shower curtain ring salesman Del Griffith (John Candy). Mishaps befall the two throughout their travels, and they endure every indignity that modern travel can inflict on its victims.

The success of the movie is founded on the essential natures of its two principal actors: Steve Martin and John Candy embody themselves, and this is key to why the film is able to reveal so much heart and truth. Neal spends the movie trying to peel off from Del, whilst Del spends the movie having his feelings hurt and then coming through for Neal anyway. It is road trip and buddy movie rolled into one, done to highly comedic effect, and my family returns to it time after time.

The last scenes of the movie deliver the emotional payoff we have been half-expecting all along. Neal undergoes a kind of moral rebirth: we know he has learned a valuable lesson about empathy, and there is true poignancy in the scene where Neal finds Del waiting alone on the L platform. Incidentally, there is a moment just before this scene where Neal, on the train home before he returns to find Del, starts to laugh quietly to himself as he recalls their misadventures. It’s wonderfully natural and it turns out that there was good reason for that: unbeknownst to Steve Martin, Hughes had kept the cameras rolling in between takes on the Chicago train, while Martin was thinking about his next lines, and in so doing captured this unguarded moment. I include it, along with a few of the other great scenes in the two-part montage below.

 

Elvis Presley appears on the Milton Berle Show (1956)

The cultural impact of Elvis Presley is hard to overstate; when he exploded on the scene, the whole phenomenon of youth entertainment exploded with him. John Lennon said: “before Elvis, there was nothing”. Now, whilst this might be an over-egged point, given that even in the ‘40s Frank Sinatra was inspiring devotion from teenage “Bobby soxers”, nonetheless there’s no doubting the cultural paradigm shift that Elvis launched. His records, his look, his moves, his ducktail quiff, his clothing…these all became embodiments of the new rock ‘n’ roll style, and, with economic prosperity putting more money into American teenagers’ pockets, it spread like wildfire.

This sensation didn’t occur overnight, however. By the end of 1955, Elvis had already recorded two dozen singles, but these were only hits on the Country and Western charts, not the main Billboard charts. That changed with his debut single for his new label, RCA Victor – Heartbreak Hotel. This time, Elvis did shoot to the top of the pop charts and stayed there for seven weeks, turning him into the darling of radio and record stores up and down the country. It was, however, television that truly made him the “King of Rock ‘n’ Roll”, and if any one appearance might be called his coronation, it was this appearance on the Milton Berle Show on 5th June 1956, when he set his guitar aside and put his whole being into a scorching and scandalous performance of Hound Dog.

Previous television appearances had featured Elvis either in close-up, singing a slow ballad, or of his full body but with his movements somewhat restricted by the acoustic guitar he was playing. But here, for the first time, the 21-year-old Elvis Presley was seen from head to toe, gyrating his soon-to-be-famous (or infamous) pelvis.

You can bet that the reaction to Elvis’ performance in the mainstream media was almost uniformly negative. The New York Daily News described Presley’s performance as marked by “the kind of animalism that should be confined to dives and bordellos”. The Journal-American said that Elvis “can’t sing a lick and makes up for vocal shortcomings with the weirdest suggestive animation short of an aborigine’s mating dance”. The Catholic weekly periodical, America, got right to the point, meanwhile, with its headline: “Beware of Elvis Presley”.

The complaints and concerns of these reactionaries, however, was pretty much drowned out by the screams of young girls, and by the end of 1956, when the Wall Street Journal was already commenting that “Elvis Presley is today a business”, they had to accept that the times had changed.

Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace (1869)

Consisting of over half a million words, spread over 1200 plus pages of small print, and involving around 600 characters (including roughly 160 historical figures), Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace enjoys almost mythical status as the archetypically monumental novel that most people either casually have on their list of books to tackle one day, or who wouldn’t dream of taking on. It is one of the most famous works of literature in history and generally considered to be an absolute masterpiece.

War and Peace is certainly a challenging read and not one to be tackled lightly. I came across it in a pile of second-hand books left by fellow travellers in a hotel in Peru, of all places, and realised that here was my opportunity to take it on (there must have been quite a few people over the years who have read it whilst on a gap year). Anticipating a slog, but not expecting to derive any actual pleasure from it, I dived in. What a pleasant surprise! Despite some admittedly distended and meandering passages on historiography and some lengthy military minutiae, I found it a thrilling read. It is historical novel, family chronicle, and philosophical treatise, all rolled into one, centred around Napoleon’s invasion of Russia and featuring the intertwined lives of the Bezuhov, Bolkonsky, Rostov and Kuragin families.

If you want to understand the big picture, thinks Tolstoy, you have to examine the details – which is exactly what he did. He studied countless manuscripts, letters, and diaries, and visited all the sites where the battles (Schöngrabern, Austerlitz, Borodino) took place, drawing maps of the area and interviewing locals who had lived through the war. The novel is so long and detailed because he believed that that was the only way to tell this story. To do it justice, the canvas had to be broad.

So War and Peace demands patience and focus, but if you are willing to accept those conditions, it is well worth the effort. If you’re in the market for an epic work encompassing love, war, religion, family, class, history, and philosophy, you could do worse than to bump it up that “must read” list of yours.

 

Leo Tolstoy

Antonio Canova’s Sculpture of the Three Graces (1817)

Back in May, my family and I visited the Victoria & Albert Museum in London, and enjoyed, amongst other things, its impressive collection of sculptures, including this beautiful piece from the great Italian neoclassical sculptor, Antonio Canova. The Three Graces were daughters of Zeus and companions to the Muses, and were a celebrated subject in classical literature and art. They are Thalia (youth and beauty), Euphrosyne (mirth), and Aglaia (elegance), and the goddesses are depicted huddled together, nude, hair braided and held atop their heads in a knot, the three slender figures melding into one in their embrace.

The sculpture is carved from a single slab of white marble. Canova’s assistants would have roughly hewn out the marble, leaving Canova to perform the final carving and shaping of the stone to highlight the Graces’ soft flesh. It was commissioned by John Russel, 6th Duke of Bedford, who visited Canova at his studio in Rome in 1814. Bedford was captivated by the group of the Three Graces which Canova had carved for the Empress Josephine, the estranged wife of Napoleon Bonaparte (“I frankly declare”, he is reported to have said, “that I have seen nothing in ancient or modern sculpture that has given me more pleasure than this piece of work”). Josephine had died in May of that year, and the Duke offered to buy the sculpture from Canova, but Josephine’s son claimed it (and that version is now in the Hermitage, St Petersburg) so Bedford commissioned a new one.

The completed statue was installed at the Duke’s home, Woburn Abbey. An 1822 catalogue of the sculpture at Woburn summed up the appeal of the work: “in the constrained flexibility with which their arms are entwined round each other; in the perfect symmetry of their limbs, in the delicacy of detail, and exquisiteness of finish, in the feet and hands; in that look of living softness given to the surface of the marble, which looks as if it would yield to the touch…this great sculptor has shown the utmost delicacy and judgement”.

It is indeed remarkable to get “up close and personal” with a great sculpture like this and marvel at the skill and delicacy required to achieve such an exquisite finish from a block of stone. Canova’s other masterpiece, Cupid and Psyche in the Louvre, elicits the same admiration.

 

 

Antonio Canova

The Sales Speech in David Mamet’s Glengarry Glen Ross (1992)

David Mamet’s two-act play, Glengarry Glen Ross, was first staged in 1983, and won the Pulitzer Prize, remaining something of a classic of contemporary theatre. It was adapted for film in 1992, by Mamet himself, and it is almost a word-for-word transcription of the play, with the one exception being this: the most famous, most quoted, and most popular scene of the movie, which is the subject of this blog, didn’t exist in the play but was written apparently to bulk out the piece to film length.

In creating the scene, Mamet arguably sets the tone for the entire movie. The movie features the pressured lives of real estate salesmen played by Jack Lemmon, Ed Harris and Alan Arkin, struggling to close deals in this toughest of tough rackets, and about to receive a visit from Blake (Alec Baldwin), the motivational speaker from Hell, who has been sent from “downtown” to read the riot act. It’s excruciating stuff; it takes a while to dawn on the salesmen just how tough this grilling is going to be (“Put that coffee down. Coffee’s for closers only…”) and we grimace at the ritual disembowelling of the poor men (“You call yourself a salesman, you son of a bitch?”).

Edifying it ain’t, but nonetheless it’s an acting masterclass from all concerned: Baldwin dishing out the flak; Lemmon like a rabbit in the headlights; Harris initially derisive and sceptical but then brow-beaten and forced to endure the spiel; Arkin submissive, silent. We can see and hear from the windows that outside is dark and the rain torrential; inside, the office is shabby and bleak and Blake is an unrelenting and pitiless tormentor. Now imagine you’ve just been told that you’re fighting to save your job in this month’s sales contest, in which first prize is a Cadillac Eldorado, second prize is a set of steak knives, and third prize is “You’re fired”. It’s stark, to say the least. You wouldn’t want to be in this game…

But hey, you’re not in this game – so sit back, relax, and enjoy not being on the receiving end of this verbal maceration and instead observe the equal measures of bravado and human frailty exhibited in this wonderfully uncomfortable performance by some great American actors.

Alec Baldwin

 

 

Claude Monet exhibits Impression, Sunrise (1874)

In 1872, Claude Monet visited his hometown of Le Havre in the north west of France and proceeded to paint six canvases depicting the port “during dawn, day, dusk, and dark and from varying viewpoints, some from the water itself and others from a hotel room looking down over the port“. One painting from this series was to become very famous.

Impression, soleil levant (Impression, Sunrise) was debuted in April 1874 in Paris at an independent exhibition launched as an alternative to the official Salon de Paris exhibitions of the Académie des Beaux-Arts. The exhibition, by a group calling itself the “Société Anonyme des Artistes, Peintres, Sculpteurs, Graveurs etc” was led by Monet, along with other such future luminaries as Edgar Degas, Camille Pissarro, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, and Alfred Sisley. Two hundred works were shown and about 4,000 people attended, including, of course, some rather unsympathetic critics.

Monet described how he came up with a title for the painting: “They asked me for a title for the catalogue…it couldn’t really be taken for a view of Le Havre, so I said: ‘Put Impression’“. While this title was apparently chosen in haste for the catalogue, the term “Impressionism” was not new. It had been used for some time to describe the effect of some of the naturalistic paintings emanating from the so-called Barbizon school of painters. However, it was in critic Louis Leroy’s review of the 1874 exhibition, “The Exhibition of the Impressionists”, for the newspaper Le Charivari, that he used “Impressionism” to describe this new style of work displayed, and he said it was typified by Monet’s painting.

This term, then, initially used to both describe and deprecate a movement, was taken up by all parties to describe the style, and Monet’s Impression, Sunrise was thus considered to have encapsulated the start of the movement. The rest, as they say, is history.

 

 

Claude Monet

Luciano Pavarotti sings Nessun Dorma (1994)

To opera buffs, Nessun Dorma has always been one of the great arias, but my, how the song’s profile was raised by its use as the theme song to the 1990 World Cup. That new audience, numbering in the scores of millions, associated the piece inextricably with the one voice, that of Italian tenor, Luciano Pavarotti. Many artists have recorded their own versions of the song – before and since – but it’s Pavarotti who is generally credited with performing the ultimate version of this song. The performance I embed below, from a show in Paris in 1994, shows exactly why it’s a justified claim. Pavarotti delivers an emotionally charged and hauntingly beautiful piece of musical theatre. Check out the emotion on his face at around the 2.40 to 2.50 mark.

Incidentally, for me, Nessun Dorma does not benefit from an English translation or an understanding of the song’s contextual meaning in Giacomo Puccini’s Turandot (though it concerns a prince, Calaf, and his attempts to win the hand of Princess Turandot), so I prefer to preserve its enigmatic majesty by ignoring its meaning and just letting it be. It’s truly powerful on its own.

Back in 2009, a few days after my mum’s funeral, my family and I, after a visit up to Blyth and on our way back, called into Durham Cathedral, significant for my mum’s stonemason dad having worked on this fine building. It turned out that it happened to be the day before Bobby Robson’s memorial service, and they were rehearsing for it as we arrived. Unsurprisingly, Nessun Dorma had been chosen to be a part of the memorial service (performed I believe, by vocal trio, Tenors Unlimited). Thus, in one of the world’s great cathedrals, and still raw from my bereavement, I heard the resounding strains of Nessun Dorma. An unforgettable moment.

Nessun dorma! Nessun dorma!
Tu pure, oh Principessa
Nella tua fredda stanza
Guardi le stelle che tremano
D’amore e di speranza

Ma il mio mistero è chiuso in me
Il nome mio nessun saprà
No, no, sulla tua bocca lo dirò
Quando la luce splenderà
Ed il mio bacio scioglierà
Il silenzio che ti fa mia

(ll nome suo nessun saprà
E noi dovrem, ahimè, morir, morir)

Dilegua, oh notte!
Tramontate, stelle!
Tramontate, stelle!
All’alba vincerò!
Vincerà!
Vincerò!

Luciano Pavarotti 2000

Julie Walters in Victoria Wood’s sketch, Two Soups (1986)

Victoria Wood’s collaborations with Julie Walters over the years spawned many a rich reward. Wood’s wit produced great ideas for characters, and Walters’ instinctive comic timing and gift for nuanced physical comedy brilliantly brought those characters to life. The series of sketches around Acorn Antiques, for example, provided the ideal showcase for Walters to ham it up as the glorious character that was Mrs Overall, or more accurately, the gloriously inept actress that played the character in this send-up of low-budget, shoddily performed, daytime soap opera.

The showcase I have selected for this blog, however, is the sketch, Waitress (popularly known as Two Soups), in which Walters plays an elderly, deaf, shaky, and painfully slow waitress, serving a couple who are only too aware one of them has a train to catch and simply want a quick meal. This simple premise, replete with possibilities for that typically British comedy of frustration, is enough for Walters to take the ball and run faster and further with it than probably even Victoria Wood imagined at first.

Witness Walters’ shuffling gait, wobbly head and fixed smile – this is physical comedy of the first order, and we’re laughing before she opens her mouth. With her bad memory and dangerously maladroit handling of the crockery, this unfit-for-purpose waitress should have hung up her apron strings years ago, but for now let’s thank the forbearance of her employer as we enjoy this infuriating but hilarious performance. Needless to say, the couple’s plans for a quick meal are thwarted.

Julie Walters

The Book of Kells (c.800)

The Book of Kells, held in Dublin’s Trinity College Library, is an illuminated manuscript Gospel book in Latin, containing the four Gospels of the New Testament. It was created in a Columban monastery in Ireland around 800 AD, and it’s a masterwork of Western calligraphy. It represents the pinnacle of insular illumination (“insular” deriving from insula, the Latin for “island” and referring to post-Roman art of Britain and Ireland). It is also widely regarded as Ireland’s finest national treasure, and although I haven’t yet made it past the pubs of Dublin to view it, it’s definitely on the list.

The illustrations and ornamentation of the Book of Kells are exquisite. The decoration combines traditional Christian iconography with ornate, swirling motifs. There are figures of humans, animals, mythical beasts, along with Celtic knots and interlacing patterns in vibrant colours, all scribed onto leaves of high-quality calf vellum with iron gall ink (the standard ink used in Europe, made from iron salts and tannic acid extracted from oak galls) and colours derived from a wide range of substances imported from distant lands.

The manuscript takes its name from the Abbey of Kells, in County Meath, which was its home for centuries. Its exact place of origin is uncertain, although it is widely thought to have been started at Iona and then later completed in the scriptorium at Kells itself. Regardless, it’s true to say that the Columban monks responsible for its creation had skills in calligraphy honed to a remarkable degree.

John Thornton’s Great East Window at York Minster (1408)

The last time my family and I visited York, we wandered outside York Minster but our indigenous frugality (being ourselves of Yorkshire soil) baulked at the then-recently introduced admission fee of £10 to go inside. If you too visit York and find yourself in similar frugal mode, let me advise you to take a hold of yourself, with an optional shake, and remind yourself never to put filthy lucre ahead of artistic splendour. For York Minster, as well as in itself being one of the great gothic cathedrals of northern Europe, and thus replete with the resplendent architectural beauty for which such cathedrals are known, contains also the largest expanse of medieval stained glass in the world, including the subject of today’s blog, the Great East Window.

Some call it England’s Sistine Chapel, and indeed, had it been done in paint, instead of in glass, it might well be considered a rival to Michelangelo’s masterpiece in Rome. However, stained glass has always fallen on the wrong side of that dividing line between fine and applied art, and thus it is seen primarily as a craft. Let’s not fall for that one. The great east window in York Minster is one of the triumphant achievements of the Middle Ages: 1,690sqft of artfully executed stained glass, recounting the story of the world from Creation to Apocalypse.

It was in 1405 that John Thornton of Coventry was commissioned to glaze the east end of the Lady Chapel. A copy of Thornton’s contract for the window survives, specifying that he was to draw all the cartoons, and paint a large number of the individual panels. For all this Thornton was paid a total of £56, and contracted to complete the job inside three years. For doing so, Thornton received a £10 bonus, and proudly put the date of completion – 1408 – at the very apex of the window.

Doubtless Thornton had behind him a team of glaziers, hired locally or brought with him from Coventry, but the painting on the glass would primarily have been his. It was Thornton’s task too to turn the commissioner’s highly theological and precise concept into a work of art. And this he self-evidently did.

While much medieval glass is dominated by reds and blues, John Thornton had a penchant for yellow as his base colour. In addition, the painting in Thornton’s faces had greater realism (and meticulously drawn hair) than his rivals. The typical Thornton face is sensitive, with eyes down-turned, a small mouth and a somewhat prominent nose. What Thornton was pioneering in his glasswork was the European style – new to England – known as International Gothic. It is elegantly stylised work; for sure, the York commissioners were buying cutting edge art, and, of course, good glass can’t be made without a cutting edge.

Commentaries on excellence in art, music, film, and literature