Sir Edward Elgar’s Nimrod Variation (1899)

Both patriotic and moving in equal measure, Sir Edward Elgar’s Nimrod variation is a staple of British patriotic events such as the Last Night of the Proms, the opening of the 2012 Olympic Games in London, and the coronations of Elizabeth II and Charles III, whilst its sombre nature lends itself equally well to the Remembrance Day service at the Cenotaph, and funerals such as those of Princess Diana and Prince Philip. It is the ninth and best-known variation in Elgar’s Enigma Variations, an orchestral work of fourteen variations on an original theme composed between 1898 and 1899.

Each variation is also a musical sketch of members of Elgar’s family and close circle of friends and contains, in Elgar’s words, “a distinct idea founded on some particular personality or perhaps on some incident known only to two people”. Thus, each variation contains a personal expression from Elgar of an aspect of each subject’s personality, or an event they shared, and the subjects are identified by either initials or a nickname: for example, the first variation is “CAE” (Elgar’s wife, Caroline Alice); others include “RBT” (Oxford classicist Richard Baxter-Townshend), “Troyte” (architect Arthur Troyte Griffith) and so on.

Variation IX (Adagio) “Nimrod” is a portrait of Augustus J. Jaeger, Elgar’s editor and publisher, and close friend. Nimrod is the great hunter of the Old Testament, and the piece is so named through a play on words: Jäger in German means ‘hunter’. This serene variation represents the years of advice and encouragement given to Elgar by Jaeger, when Elgar was suffering depressive episodes and lack of confidence in his work. Jaeger had reminded him that Beethoven had had similar anxieties and yet his music had only increased in beauty; in tribute to this moment, Nimrod’s opening moments evoke subtle hints of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No. 8.

The piece builds through long phrases of swelling dynamics and rippling melody, and the emotional climax comes slowly but surely. Solemn and evocative, Nimrod has everyone reaching for their hankies. Enjoy this version featuring Gustavo Dudamel conducting the Simon Bolivar Symphony Orchestra.

Sir Edward Elgar

Claude Debussy’s Prélude à l’Après-Midi d’un Faune (1894)

When I was a boy I got some piano lessons from my grandma, whose creaky piano had been a feature of her back room for as long as I could remember, and although my progress was limited (and permanently arrested at age thirteen when I discovered the guitar), I retain some vivid memories: my grandma singing the music hall favourite Two Lovely Black Eyes in her trademark falsetto, as well as Edelweiss from The Sound Of Music and the military march song Men Of Harlech (after which, for a period, she would address me as Dai Bach, or ‘little David’ in Welsh, as if recalling familial roots that never existed). I would faithfully learn these songs on the piano, whilst leaving the unique singing to her.

Another piece of music I recall practising in those years was Claude Debussy’s Clair De Lune. No doubt every erstwhile piano student does. It’s a haunting and lovely tune, for sure, and later I was to learn that Debussy was a veritable master of the haunting and lovely tune. He had an astonishing ability to translate the natural world into sound for orchestral and solo piano music. Listen to La Mer, for example, one of many pieces Debussy wrote about water: it’s easy to discern the ‘sound’ of the play of light on water. The evocative musical imagery captured so cleverly in such compositions as Rêverie, Images, Préludes, Études and Nocturnes led him to be dubbed the first Impressionist composer, the musical equivalent of Monet, Cézanne and Renoir (he was none too happy with the term by all accounts, but I’d have taken it).

My favourite evocation, though, as a fan of the pastoral and bucolic, is Prélude à l’Après-Midi d’un Faune. Based on Stéphane Mallarmé’s symbolist poem of the same name, the Prélude conjures up a dream-like world of idyllic woodland thick with summer haze, in which sprawls a lethargic faun, waking from reverie. If you don’t know it from its title, you’ll know it when you hear it from the excerpt below (it’s been used all over the shop). Oh, to be a faun in a mythological Greek summer landscape! Beats working…

Claude Debussy

Saturday Night Live’s More Cowbell Sketch (2000)

The American late-night live television sketch comedy show, Saturday Night Live, has been a launchpad for many a career since its first broadcast in 1975. Although it’s not the staple here in the UK that it clearly is in the States, we are very aware of its cultural significance and we can marvel at the names that have passed through the ranks of its cast: John Belushi, Dan Aykroyd, Gilda Radner, Chevy Chase, Bill Murray, Eddie Murphy, Billy Crystal, Christopher Guest, Dana Carvey, Mike Myers, Chris Rock, Adam Sandler, Norm Macdonald, Will Ferrell, Sarah Silverman, Tina Fey…

The classic sketches that the show has spawned over the years are as many and varied as its extensive cast list, and it’s fun to peruse Rolling Stone’s “50 Greatest Saturday Night Live Sketches of All Time”. My number one is Rolling Stone’s number nine but let’s not quibble: More Cowbell is comedy gold, however you rank it. The sketch aired on 8th April 2000 and it’s safe to say that the stars aligned that night.

The sketch was written by regular cast member Will Ferrell who was inspired by an episode of VH1’s Behind the Music documenting the band Blue Öyster Cult and their 1976 recording of their biggest hit, (Don’t Fear) The Reaper. Ferrell reimagines the scene, with Christopher Walken as fictional legendary music producer Bruce Dickinson, himself as fictional cowbell player Gene Frenkle, and with other SNL cast members (Chris Parnell, Jimmy Fallon, Chris Kattan, Horatio Sanz) playing the real Blue Öyster Cult members. What followed was to go down in SNL history.

Christopher Walken’s character introduces himself as Bruce Dickinson (“Yes, the Bruce Dickinson“) and tells the band that they have “what appears to be a dynamite sound“. The band are in awe of him, and he doesn’t do too much to dispel the belief that he is indeed a legendary producer: “Easy guys, I put my pants on just like the rest of you, one leg at a time…except, once my pants are on, I make gold records!”. Walken’s delivery is sublime.

The first take seems to go well but the band stops playing due to being distracted by Gene’s overzealous cowbell playing. Dickinson, to the surprise of most of the band, asks for “a little more cowbell” and urges Gene to “really explore the studio space this time“. Gene’s exuberance in following instructions only causes more distraction and the band aborts another take, but Bruce doubles down on his insistence that “I gotta have more cowbell!” and the absurdity continues hilariously.

The characters, the timing, and the dialogue are all to a tee, and even the actors’ attempts to avoid corpsing during the sketch add to the thrill – just watch Jimmy Fallon shoving his drumsticks into his mouth to (vainly) cover his giggles! Enjoy the sketch (in 2 parts) below…

More Cowbell

 

Canaletto’s The Mouth Of The Grand Canal Looking West Towards The Carità (1730)

If you visit London’s National Gallery’s Room 38 you will see a fine collection of paintings by Canaletto (Giovanni Antonio Canal, 1697-1768), the Italian artist famed for his vedute of Venice (a veduta is a highly detailed, usually large-scale painting or print of a cityscape or some other vista). He was born in Venice, the son of another painter, Bernardo Canal, hence his mononym Canaletto, or “little Canal” (and nothing to do with the Venetian canals that he later depicted). Canaletto was apprenticed to his father whose main career was in theatre set design, so he got to work on painting theatrical scenes for operas by the likes of Vivaldi, Scarlatti and others. However, it was when, in around 1723, he began to paint the daily life of Venice and its people, that he found his true calling.

Canaletto sold many of his grand scenes of the canals of Venice and the Doge’s Palace to Englishmen on their Grand Tour, and his career really took off when he began his association with Joseph Smith, an English businessman and collector living in Venice who was to become British Consul in Venice in 1744. Smith became the artist’s principal agent and patron, and was instrumental in introducing Grand Tourists to his work and arranging commissions. He also acquired nearly fifty paintings and one hundred fifty drawings from Canaletto, the largest and finest single group of the artist’s works, which he sold to King George III in 1762.

In the 1740s, the War of the Austrian Succession led to a reduction in the number of British visitors to Venice (war can do that) and thus disrupted Canaletto’s market, and so in 1746 he moved to London, living in London’s Soho district and successfully producing views of London and of his patrons’ houses and castles. He remained in England until 1755 and returned to Venice where he continued to paint until his death in 1768. His connection with Britain had been sealed, however, and now you can find his paintings not only in the National Gallery but in Buckingham Palace, the Wallace Collection and indeed there’s a fine set of 24 in the dining room at Woburn Abbey.

Here is just one from the Royal Collection, The Mouth of the Grand Canal looking West towards the Carità (1729-30), and then a view of the exquisite Woburn Abbey dining room.

Canaletto, The Mouth of the Grand Canal looking West towards the Carita, c.1729-30,
Woburn Abbey
Canaletto

Cole Porter’s You Do Something To Me (1929)

There’s a scene in the 1972 movie Sleuth, wherein eccentric millionaire crime writer Andrew Wyke (Laurence Olivier) has invited his wife’s lover, Italian hairdresser Milo Tindle (Michael Caine), to his mansion, under false pretences, and proceeded to shoot him dead in what he believes to be the perfect murder. He struts self-assuredly around his kitchen, busying himself in preparation of a celebratory champagne-and-caviar supper to the strains of Cole Porter’s song You Do Something To Me piped in from a distant gramophone. Now, the movie itself deserves a blog all to itself, since it is a gripping and brilliantly-written piece of drama with bravura performances from the two aforementioned greats of the silver screen, but this is not about the movie but the song.

The song is typical of Cole Porter (1891-1964), American composer and songwriter noted for his witty, urbane lyrics and writer of many a song that would find success on Broadway in the 1920s and 30s, and become part of what we now call the Great American Songbook. His songs trip off the tongue: You’re The Top; Let’s Do It, Let’s Fall In Love; Anything Goes; I Get A Kick Out Of You; Begin The Beguine; I’ve Got You Under My Skin; Let’s Misbehave; Ev’ry Time We Say Goodbye; Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? et al. His songs have of course been covered by, well, everyone…and so I attempted to find out which artist had recorded the particular version that we hear in Sleuth (below)…

Surely a straightforward google-able task? But not so: having failed to find the identity of the artist from the obvious sources, I was led instead and circuitously to this forum of musical soundtrack enthusiasts (below). Starting in 2006, one “gloriotski” kicks off the thread with the same question that was on my lips, but “coma” sets the ensuing tone with “I’ve checked all available sources but nobody really seems to know”.

Other amateur musical sleuths, determined to crack the mystery, steam in, with the suggestions rolling in: Fred Astaire, Al Johnson, Mel Tormé, Al Bowlly, Pat O’Malley, Sam Browne (indeed, virtually everyone except Marlene Dietrich)? But the years tick by, and one by one each confident suggestion has been debunked, right up to 2021 when we seem to have got no further:

Perhaps we’ll never know…but I can live with that (in fact, I’m rather glad that the mystery has endured) because in the course of my research I came across this wonderful version recorded by Harry Reser’s Clicquot Club Eskimo Orchestra, with vocals by Harry “Scrappy” Lambert. Enjoy!

Cole Porter

Matthew Arnold’s Dover Beach (1867)

Matthew Arnold (1822 – 1888) is sometimes called the third great Victorian poet alongside Alfred, Lord Tennyson and Robert Browning, although, unlike those two full-time moneyed poets, he actually had a proper job too, earning his living working as an inspector of schools for thirty-five years. He was the son of the celebrated headmaster of Rugby School, Thomas Arnold (who was a neighbour and good friend of William Wordsworth, unsurprisingly a strong influence on the young Matthew), and it was at Rugby where Matthew Arnold received most of his education before winning a scholarship to Balliol College, Oxford.

In 1849 (the year before Wordsworth’s death), Arnold published his first book of poetry, The Strayed Reveller, and followed that up in 1852 with his second volume of poems, Empedocles on Etna, and Other Poems, coinciding with the launch of both his school-inspecting career and his marriage. Much output would follow and not just in poetry: Arnold wrote in prose too and was an influential literary, political and social critic. Between 1867 and 1869 he wrote Culture and Anarchy, setting his High Victorian cultural agenda, and famous for the term he popularised to denote a certain sub-set of the English population: “Philistines”, i.e. namely that class of persons having a deprecatory attitude towards art, beauty, spirituality and intellect. He would have felt at home here at OGOTS Towers, I feel sure!

These days, Arnold is perhaps best known for his poem Dover Beach. The poem’s speaker (whom we may assume is Matthew Arnold himself) begins by describing a calm and quiet sea out in the English Channel. He is standing on the Dover coast and looking out across to France, where a small light can be seen briefly and then vanishes. Throughout the poem Arnold crafts visual and auditory imagery of the sea receding and returning to land. At this point in time, though, the sea is not returning; it is receding farther out, and we realise that Arnold is equating it with the diminution of religious faith amongst his compatriots.

This was, after all, the post-Darwin era, when religious faith was being profoundly challenged, and Arnold was known to bemoan the creep of materialism and, in his eyes, its attendant philistinism. For him, truth and beauty were in retreat, like the tide, and, apart from the fact that he has his missus beside him (“Ah, love, let us be true to one another!”), there’s little light at the end of his tunnel, and the poem remains pessimistic to the end. It’s probably a blessing that Arnold is not around today: I suspect he would consider his pessimism to have been understated!

The sea is calm tonight.
The tide is full, the moon lies fair
Upon the straits; on the French coast the light
Gleams and is gone; the cliffs of England stand,
Glimmering and vast, out in the tranquil bay.
Come to the window, sweet is the night-air!
Only, from the long line of spray
Where the sea meets the moon-blanched land,
Listen! you hear the grating roar
Of pebbles which the waves draw back, and fling,
At their return, up the high strand,
Begin, and cease, and then again begin,
With tremulous cadence slow, and bring
The eternal note of sadness in.

Sophocles long ago
Heard it on the Ægean, and it brought
Into his mind the turbid ebb and flow
Of human misery; we
Find also in the sound a thought,
Hearing it by this distant northern sea.

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth’s shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.

Ah, love, let us be true
To one another! for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain;
And we are here as on a darkling plain
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.

Matthew Arnold

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s Faust (1808)

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s great tragic play, Faust (1808), tells the notorious tale of Dr Faust and his deal with the Devil, a theme that we see recurring in Western art and literature time and time again. Dr Faust is the learned German scholar who is disillusioned by his inability to discover life’s true meaning despite his mastery of the sciences and the traditional and conventional modes of thought. In desperation, he considers resorting to the arts of magic to resolve his frustration, and this attracts the attention of the demon Mephistopheles who will tempt Faust into signing a contract in blood: a lifetime of the Devil’s servitude in exchange for Faust’s immortal soul.

There’s plenty to unpack here and several interesting avenues we can go down. First of all, what of this eponymous character, Dr Faust? Well, he was based upon a real person, one Johann Georg Faust (c.1480 – c.1540), who was an obscure German itinerant alchemist, astrologer, and magician. In the decades following his death, he became the subject of folk legend, transmitted in so-called chapbooks, beginning in the 1580s. Chapbooks, rather than being books for chaps (at least, not exclusively), were actually short, low-budget street literature that were very popular with the public throughout Europe (this was before Waterstones).

The legend of Faust was seized upon long before Goethe: Christopher Marlowe adapted the persona into his play The Tragical History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus in 1604, and the Faustbuch brand of chapbook survived throughout the early modern period. Thus, when Goethe wrote Faust, he was dramatising a long-established tradition.

How about the character of Mephistopheles? Here too, we find Mephistopheles appearing for the first time in the early Faustbuchs; he is not the Devil himself but a demon working on behalf of the Devil, and in fact, since he was invented by the anonymous author(s) of the Faustbuch, he is solely a literary character and doesn’t form part of the traditional hierarchy of demonology. In Goethe’s hands he is not only cold-hearted and cynical, as you’d expect, but also supremely witty, and has all the best lines (hence we are reminded of the modern-day observation that “the Devil has the best tunes”).

And the deal itself? The devil and his fiendish temptations have been a literary staple ever since Eve bit the proverbial apple, and mankind has always been grimly fascinated by the trope of trading one’s soul for wealth or superhuman powers, from Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray to Terry Gilliam’s The Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus. In the case of Goethe’s Faust, the whole is a symbolic and panoramic commentary on the human condition, written in verse throughout, and a classic of European literature. To the Devil his due…

Eugène Delacroix, Faust and Mephistopheles
Goethe

 

Ludwig van Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9 in D minor (1824)

Beethoven’s Ninth (Symphony No. 9 in D minor) was his last complete symphony but it also happens to be regarded by many musicologists as his greatest work and one of the supreme achievements in the history of music. Not bad for a last major work, considering how many artists generally peak at some point earlier in their careers and tail off somewhat towards the end. It was composed between 1822 and 1824 and was the first example of a major composer using voices in a symphony. The final movement features four vocal soloists and a chorus, with words adapted from the poem by Friedrich Schiller, Ode to Joy (lending the tune its famous common name).

There are a number of anecdotes about the premiere of the Ninth, at the Theater am Kärntnertor in Vienna on the 7th May 1824, based on the testimony of some of the participants. There are suggestions that it was under-rehearsed and a bit scrappy, but regardless it was an enormous success. In any case, Beethoven was not to blame, since he was by now deaf and although he was ostensibly conducting so as to be present for the audience, it was actually co-conductor Louis Duport whose baton was followed by the musicians. Violinist Joseph Böhm recalled:

“[Beethoven] stood in front of a conductor’s stand and threw himself back and forth like a madman. At one moment he stretched to his full height, at the next he crouched down to the floor, he flailed about with his hands and feet as though he wanted to play all the instruments and sing all the chorus parts.”

When the audience applauded Beethoven was several bars off and still conducting, so contralto Caroline Unger walked over and turned Beethoven around to accept the audience’s applause. According to the critic for the Theater-Zeitung, “the public received the musical hero with the utmost respect and sympathy, listened to his wonderful, gigantic creations with the most absorbed attention and broke out in jubilant applause.” The audience gave him five standing ovations; there were handkerchiefs and hats in the air, and raised hands, so that Beethoven, who they knew could not hear the applause, could at least see the ovations.

Here’s an excerpt from the Ode to Joy played by the Chicago Symphony Orchestra.

Ludwig van Beethoven

Oliver Postgate’s Noggin The Nog (1959)

Persons of a certain age (and perhaps persons of any age, given the enduring popularity of his creations) will remember with affection the voice of animator and puppeteer Oliver Postgate (1925–2008). He was the creator, writer and narrator of such popular and charming children’s TV programmes as Bagpuss, Noggin the Nog, Ivor the Engine, Clangers and Pogles’ Wood. All these shows were made by Smallfilms, the company he set up in 1959 with collaborator, artist and puppet maker Peter Firmin, in a disused cowshed near Peter’s home in Blean near Canterbury.

They were a great team: Postgate came up with the concepts, wrote the scripts and did the stop motion filming whilst Firmin did the artwork and built the models. As Postgate voiced so many of the productions, his distinctive voice became familiar to generations of children. Smallfilms was able to produce two minutes of TV-ready film per day, which was many times more than a conventional stop motion animation studio of the time, with Postgate moving the (originally cardboard) characters himself, and working his 16mm camera frame-by-frame with a home-made clicker.

They began in 1959 with Ivor the Engine, a series for ITV about a Welsh steam locomotive who wanted to sing in a choir, and followed it up, also in 1959, with Noggin the Nog, their first production for the BBC. These two programmes established Smallfilms as a safe pair of hands to produce children’s entertainment and they went on to produce material for the BBC right up to the 1980s. Everyone will have their favourite (in a 1999 BBC poll Bagpuss was voted the most popular children’s TV programme of all time) and for me it was Noggin the Nog.

The stories were based around the central character of Noggin, the good-natured son of Knut, King of the Nogs, and his queen Grunhilda. When King Knut dies, Noggin meets and marries Princess Nooka of the Nooks, and becomes the new king, at the expense of arch-villain Nogbad the Bad, who is forever trying to claim Noggin’s throne for himself. Other characters included lazy Captain of the Royal Guard Thornogson, eccentric inventor Olaf the Lofty, and Graculus, a big green bird. The names and themes are very Scandinavian and saga-tinged and Postgate must have been very familiar with the Nordic folkloric tales of old such as the Icelandic Eddas, but of course it’s children’s TV so it’s all just wonderfully made-up fun.

The pair brought in composer Vernon Elliott to create atmospheric musical sketches for the programmes and he did so with great effect using the bassoon, harp, glockenspiel and, in the case of the Clangers’ distinctive voices, the swanee whistle. Speaking of Clangers, Firmin once said that the show’s surrealism had led to accusations that Postgate was taking hallucinogenic drugs: “People used to say, ‘Ooh, what’s Oliver on, with all of these weird ideas?’ And we used to say, ‘He’s on cups of tea and biscuits'”. So very British!

Enjoy this nostalgic selection of opening segments from Noggin the Nog, Clangers, and that “saggy, old cloth cat, baggy, and a bit loose at the seams”, Bagpuss

Oliver Postgate and Peter Firmin

P G Wodehouse’s Carry On, Jeeves (1925)

PG (Sir Pelham Grenville) Wodehouse (1881–1975) was an English author who was one of the most widely read humourists of the 20th century. A prolific writer throughout his life, Wodehouse published more than ninety books and would often have two or more books on the go at any one time. His prose style and subject matter was light and breezy and, in his own words, he wanted to spread “sweetness and light”. Just look at those titles: Nothing Serious, Laughing Gas, Joy in the Morning. With every sparkling joke, every gently innocent character, and every farcical tussle, all set in an idealised world of the 1920s and 30s, Wodehouse whisks us far away from our worries.

He had many fans among the great and the good, including former British prime ministers and many of his fellow writers such as George Orwell and Evelyn Waugh; I seem to remember reading that Lemmy of Motorhead used to read him on his tour bus, post-gig! Although Wodehouse wrote several series of books about various characters such as the Blandings Castle set, the unrufflable monocle-wearing Old Etonian Psmith (with a silent P), and the tall-tale-telling Mr Mulliner, most people will know him for the comic creations, Jeeves and Wooster.

Bertie Wooster is the moneyed young toff who cares little about anything other than fashionable socks, frippery, and tophole societal high jinks, whilst Jeeves is the sagacious valet who clearly has the brains that Bertie lacks and who steers his master through many a social storm. The Jeeves canon consists of 35 short stories and 11 novels, and a wonderful starting point is 1925’s collection of ten short stories, Carry On, Jeeves.

My own introduction to Wodehouse, like many people, was the 1990s TV series Jeeves and Wooster, with Hugh Laurie as Bertie and Stephen Fry as Jeeves. Jeeves and Wooster was a weekly escape into a jazz-age wonderland of art-deco apartments, panelled gentlemen’s clubs, “tissue-restoring” cocktails and buffet breakfasts, all serving as a backdrop to a series of predicaments for Bertie from which he would invariably be extricated by Jeeves. The drama was always held together by fizzing dialogue, peppered with bons mots and not a few neologisms from Wodehouse’s pen.

As befitting a man whose characters and situations had such lightness of being, Wodehouse didn’t take himself too seriously either, as this rejoinder to a critic below shows:

A certain critic – for such men, I regret to say, do exist – made the nasty remark about my last novel that it contained ‘all the old Wodehouse characters under different names’…he will not be able to make a similar charge against Summer Lightning. With my superior intelligence, I have out-generalled the man this time by putting in all the old Wodehouse characters under the same names. Pretty silly it will make him feel, I rather fancy.”

Here’s a typical scene from the TV series wherein Bertie finds himself embroiled in a secret love triangle in high danger of imminent exposure and it’s down to Jeeves to pull off a suitably clever rescue.

P G Wodehouse

Commentaries on excellence in art, music, film, and literature