HG Wells’s The War Of The Worlds (1898)

HG (Her­bert George) Wells (1866–1946) was a pro­lif­ic writer with more than fifty nov­els and dozens of short sto­ries to his name. His out­put was an eclec­tic mix, includ­ing works of social com­men­tary, pol­i­tics, his­to­ry, pop­u­lar sci­ence, satire, biog­ra­phy, and futur­ism (he fore­saw the advent of air­craft, tanks, space trav­el, nuclear weapons, satel­lite tele­vi­sion and some­thing akin to the World Wide Web) – but of course what he is best remem­bered for is his sci­ence fic­tion, fol­low­ing the remark­able rapid-fire pub­li­ca­tion over a four-year peri­od of instant clas­sics The Time Machine (1895), The Island of Doc­tor More­au (1896), The Invis­i­ble Man (1897), and The War of the Worlds (1898).

The War of the Worlds is one of the ear­li­est sto­ries to detail a con­flict between mankind and an extra-ter­res­tri­al race. It presents itself as a fac­tu­al account of a Mar­t­ian inva­sion as wit­nessed by the nar­ra­tor. You know the plot: appar­ent mete­ors have rained down around the narrator’s home town of Wok­ing (through which I trav­elled by train recent­ly, prompt­ing me to make a men­tal note to write this very blog), but which of course turn out to be far from inor­gan­ic space rock, but instead very much not-friend­ly space aliens bent on destroy­ing human­i­ty.

The first edi­tion was illus­trat­ed by British artist War­wick Gob­le: inky, black-and-white depic­tions that were eerie, imag­i­na­tive, excit­ing, and thor­ough­ly of their late Vic­to­ri­an time. Lat­er, in 1906, the French edi­tions were illus­trat­ed by the Brazil­ian artist Hen­rique Alvim Cor­rêa, which turned out to be some­thing of an upgrade, adding to the evo­ca­tion of Wells’ imag­ined crea­tures and their ves­sels, and of which Wells him­self might­i­ly approved.

The War of the Worlds has spawned half a dozen fea­ture films and tele­vi­sion series, a record album and musi­cal show (Jeff Wayne, of course), but per­haps the most impact­ful drama­ti­sa­tion came in the 1938 radio pro­gramme direct­ed by and star­ring Orson Welles. It was very much played for real and if you hap­pened to miss the intro­duc­to­ry mono­logue – which thou­sands of lis­ten­ers did – you could be for­giv­en for think­ing the dra­ma was a live news­cast of devel­op­ing events. The pro­gramme famous­ly cre­at­ed wide­spread pan­ic with hordes of peo­ple believ­ing that  a real-life Mar­t­ian inva­sion was under­way right then in North Amer­i­ca (Welles had swapped out Wok­ing for Grover’s Mill, New Jer­sey). It’s easy to scoff at the mass cred­u­lous­ness of the pub­lic, but you decide: here’s a clip of the broad­cast. Might you have believed it, too?

HG Wells

Jacques-Louis David’s Oath Of The Horatii (1784)

A gen­er­a­tion or two before the Impres­sion­ists, French artists didn’t have the lux­u­ry of lolling about fields paint­ing haystacks and gen­er­al­ly hav­ing a wheeze of a time. At a time of seis­mic social and polit­i­cal change, an artist had to box clever to stay on the right side of dan­ger­ous polit­i­cal forces. Jacques-Louis David (1748–1825) was one such painter who man­aged to suc­cess­ful­ly nav­i­gate his way — and his art — from the final years of the Ancien Régime through the French Rev­o­lu­tion and the rise and fall of Napoleon.

David was con­sid­ered to be the pre­em­i­nent painter of the Neo­clas­si­cal era, that return to the high-mind­ed sever­i­ty of the arts of ancient Greece and Rome in con­trast to the friv­o­li­ty of the late Baroque. David’s his­to­ry paint­ing matched the moral cli­mate of the final years of Louis XVI and he was favoured by the Court. How­ev­er, David lat­er became an active sup­port­er of the French Rev­o­lu­tion and friend of Robe­spierre, and his Death of Marat (1793) became one of the most famous images of the era.

Impris­oned briefly after Robe­spier­re’s fall from pow­er, he aligned him­self with yet anoth­er polit­i­cal regime upon his release: that of Napoleon, the First Con­sul of France. As well as his suit­ably hero­ic ren­der­ing of Napoleon in his Napoleon at the Saint-Bernard Pass (1801), he also cre­at­ed the mon­u­men­tal The Coro­na­tion of Napoleon (1806). Final­ly, after Napoleon’s fall from pow­er and the Bour­bon revival, David exiled him­self to Brus­sels, where he remained until his death.

How­ev­er, let’s return to David’s ori­gins with a paint­ing con­sid­ered a Neo­clas­si­cal mas­ter­piece, Oath of the Hor­atii (1784). It depicts a scene from a Roman leg­end about a sev­enth-cen­tu­ry BC dis­pute between two war­ring cities, Rome and Alba Lon­ga. Instead of the two cities send­ing their armies to war, they agree to choose three men from each city; the vic­tor in that fight will be the vic­to­ri­ous city. From Rome, three broth­ers from a Roman fam­i­ly, the Hor­atii, agree to fight three broth­ers from a fam­i­ly of Alba Lon­ga, the Curi­atii.

The three Hor­atii broth­ers, will­ing to sac­ri­fice their lives for the good of Rome, are shown salut­ing their father who holds their swords out for them. There could be no more evoca­tive a scene of patri­ot­ic duty and, although paint­ed four years before the Rev­o­lu­tion, it nonethe­less became a sym­bol of loy­al­ty to State and a defin­ing image of the time.

Of the three Hor­atii broth­ers, only one will sur­vive the con­fronta­tion and he will kill each Curi­atii broth­er in turn, seiz­ing vic­to­ry for Rome. Aside from the three broth­ers depict­ed, David also rep­re­sents, in the bot­tom right cor­ner, a woman cry­ing. She is Camil­la, a sis­ter of the Hor­atii, who hap­pens to be also betrothed to one of the Curi­atii fight­ers, and thus she weeps in the real­i­sa­tion that, what­ev­er hap­pens, she will lose some­one she loves.

Eric Satie’s Gymnopédie No. 1 (1888)

Pret­ty much all of the clas­si­cal com­posers I have writ­ten about in this blog so far (let’s see: Brahms, Mozart, Chopin, Mendelssohn, to name but a few) were pro­lif­ic and com­plex and not­ed for being child prodi­gies for whom an upward musi­cal tra­jec­to­ry was clear­ly in the off­ing. Not so this week’s enig­mat­ic com­pos­er, Eric Satie (1866–1925). The son of a French father and a Scot­tish moth­er, Satie stud­ied at the Paris Con­ser­va­toire, but was an undis­tin­guished stu­dent and left with­out even obtain­ing a diplo­ma (one tutor described his piano tech­nique as “insignif­i­cant and worth­less”; they did­n’t hold back in those days), work­ing through­out the 1880s as a pianist in café-cabaret in Mont­martre, Paris. At this time, how­ev­er, he would begin com­pos­ing works, most­ly for solo piano such as his Gymnopédies and Gnossi­ennes, that would pro­pel him to an unan­tic­i­pat­ed renown.

Satie famous­ly employed a min­i­mal­ist, pared back style of music in con­trast to the grand and epic com­po­si­tions of a Wag­n­er, for exam­ple.  In fact, he would influ­ence a whole new gen­er­a­tion of French com­posers away from post-Wag­ner­ian impres­sion­ism and towards a spar­er, ters­er style. Among those influ­enced by him dur­ing his life­time were Mau­rice Rav­el (see his Boléro, for exam­ple) and he is seen as an influ­ence on more recent, min­i­mal­ist com­posers such as John Cage and Arvo Pärt.

Satie was an enig­ma, for sure, and some­thing of a quirky char­ac­ter. He gave some of his lat­er works absurd titles, such as Ver­i­ta­bles Pre­ludes flasques (pour un chien) (“True Flab­by Pre­ludes (for a Dog)”, 1912), and Cro­quis et agac­eries d’un gros bon­homme en bois (“Sketch­es and Exas­per­a­tions of a Big Wood­en Man”, 1913). He nev­er mar­ried, and his home for most of his adult life was a sin­gle small room, first in Mont­martre and lat­er in Arcueil. He adopt­ed var­i­ous images over the years, includ­ing a peri­od in qua­si-priest­ly garb, anoth­er in which he always wore iden­ti­cal­ly coloured vel­vet suits, and anoth­er, per­haps his most endur­ing per­sona, in which he wore a neat bour­geois cos­tume, with bowler hat, wing col­lar, and umbrel­la. He was a life­long heavy drinker, and died of cir­rho­sis of the liv­er at the age of 59.

If you think you don’t know Eric Satie’s music, think again, as you’re sure to recog­nise his Gymnopédie No. 1 that you can hear here against some footage of old Paris (I love these old videos, don’t you, dur­ing the advent of mov­ing pic­tures when passers-by would stare or glance at this strange new-fan­gled giz­mo point­ing at them, and seem­ing to con­nect, albeit briefly, with we the view­er well over a cen­tu­ry lat­er).

Eric Satie

 

 

Cat Stevens’ Tea For The Tillerman (1970)

One of the advan­tages of hav­ing old­er sis­ters in the ear­ly sev­en­ties when I was just start­ing to dis­cov­er music was the inher­i­tance from them of cer­tain clas­sic albums. In ret­ro­spect, I admire their gen­eros­i­ty, because it’s not every­one who relin­quish­es large parts of their music col­lec­tion to younger sib­lings (I’m not sure I would have, had I had any). Nonethe­less, I came to own and appre­ci­ate at a young age such sem­i­nal records as David Bowie’s The Rise and Fall of Zig­gy Star­dust and the Spi­ders of Mars, the Moody Blues’ In Search of the Lost Chord, and Led Zeppelin’s Led Zep­pelin II. Oh, and also three clas­sic albums by the sub­ject of today’s blog, Cat Stevens, name­ly Mona Bone Jakon, Tea for the Tiller­man, and Teas­er and the Fire­cat.

These three albums sprung out of what was an impres­sive­ly rich peri­od of out­put from Cat: in order, they had been released in April 1970, Novem­ber 1970 and Octo­ber 1971. Not that I knew the order of release back then – I wasn’t yet a geek – they were sim­ply records, but records chock-full of warm, catchy folk-pop, occa­sion­al­ly with a Greek tinge in homage to his part-Hel­lenic her­itage (his father was Cypri­ot, his moth­er Swedish, and Cat him­self – Steven Geor­giou — was born in Maryle­bone, Lon­don).

Songs that res­onat­ed: Kat­man­du from Mona Bone Jakon, a lilt­ing, mys­ti­cal acoustic song awash with flute from a 19-year-old Peter Gabriel, and a paean to all things sim­ple and peace­ful, a metaphor­ic Eden away from West­ern civil­i­sa­tion. Years lat­er I would be rid­ing a bus into the real Kath­man­du in Nepal with this track play­ing mean­ing­ful­ly on my Sony Walk­man.

From Teas­er and the Fire­cat: Peace Train, and its hope­ful, anti-war lyrics (Out on the edge of dark­ness, There rides a peace train, Oh peace train take this coun­try, Come take me home again). Ide­al­is­tic, sure, but it cer­tain­ly struck a chord with me at the time, and if you can’t be ide­al­is­tic as a young teenag­er, when can you be (the gim­let eye of expe­ri­ence hadn’t yet been acquired)?

And from Tea for the Tiller­man, the beau­ti­ful­ly craft­ed Father and Son, a poignant exchange between a father fail­ing to under­stand his son’s desire to break away, and the son strug­gling to artic­u­late the dri­ve he feels to seek his own des­tiny. I always had trav­el in my soul, and dreamt of tak­ing off into the wider world, so this spoke to me in vol­umes, even though I didn’t actu­al­ly have to deal with any such cul­tur­al mis­align­ments with my own dad.

After famous­ly con­vert­ing to Islam and chang­ing his name to Yusuf Islam in 1978, and drop­ping out of the spot­light for many years, Cat returned to pop music in 2006 and released an album of new pop songs (for the first time in 28 years), under the name Yusuf. In Sep­tem­ber 2020, and now under the com­bi­na­to­r­i­al name Yusuf/Cat Stevens, he released Tea for the Tiller­man 2, a reboot of the orig­i­nal to cel­e­brate its 50th anniver­sary.

Anoth­er great song from that album was Where Do The Chil­dren Play? and here is Cat play­ing a sim­ple acoustic ver­sion of it and prov­ing that he’s still got a voice like warm molasses. A shout out to my mate Gra­ham for send­ing me this and inspir­ing this week’s blog!

Cat Stevens

Patrick McGoohan as The Prisoner (1967)

Although I was too young at the time to watch the orig­i­nal 1967 air­ing of this British TV series, I guess it must have been re-run in the eight­ies or per­haps my friend Alec had it on video and shared it with me? What­ev­er, at some point in the eight­ies I dis­cov­ered The Pris­on­er and, hooked from episode one, I became, with Alec, a big fan. Here was a TV series that was not only enter­tain­ing but actu­al­ly made you think. Noth­ing was ever what it seemed, no-one had a real name, you nev­er knew who the good guys were and who the bad; it had a unique, sur­re­al vibe, and it incor­po­rat­ed ele­ments of sci­ence fic­tion, alle­go­ry, spy fic­tion and psy­cho­log­i­cal dra­ma.

The show was cre­at­ed while Patrick McGoohan and George Mark­stein were work­ing on spy dra­ma Dan­ger Man (fun fact: Ian Flem­ing worked in the devel­op­ment stage of Dan­ger Man, and its pro­tag­o­nist, played by McGoohan, announces him­self as “Drake…John Drake”). The exact details of who cre­at­ed which aspects of The Pris­on­er are dis­put­ed though major­i­ty opin­ion cred­its McGoohan as the sole cre­ator of the series, and it’s cer­tain­ly true that it was McGoohan who pitched the idea ver­bal­ly to sta­tion boss Lew Grade. One can only imag­ine the inner work­ings of Grade’s mind as the con­cept and plot were laid down for him; how­ev­er, he went with it and the project was born.

So, what was that plot? An unnamed British intel­li­gence agent is abduct­ed and wakes up in a mys­te­ri­ous coastal loca­tion known to its res­i­dents as the Vil­lage. His cap­tors des­ig­nate him as Num­ber Six and try to find out why he abrupt­ly resigned from his job, some­thing he stead­fast­ly refus­es to divulge. His chief antag­o­nist is styled Num­ber Two (and no, we nev­er sat­is­fac­to­ri­ly learn who is Num­ber One), the iden­ti­ty of whom changes with near­ly every episode, allow­ing a ros­ter of well-known six­ties’ actors, like Leo McK­ern, Anton Rodgers and Peter Wyn­garde, to play their part.

Most of the res­i­dents are pris­on­ers them­selves, while oth­ers are embed­ded as spies or guards. The Vil­lage is sur­round­ed by moun­tains on three sides and the sea on the oth­er, and any would-be escapees who make it out to sea are tracked by CCTV and recap­tured by Rover, a huge mobile translu­cent white bal­loon-thing. Every­one uses num­bers for iden­ti­fi­ca­tion, and most of the vil­lagers wear a stan­dard out­fit con­sist­ing of coloured blaz­ers, mul­ti­coloured capes, striped sweaters, and a vari­ety of head­wear such as straw boaters. They are gen­er­al­ly very polite, though that tends to make you very sus­pi­cious of them.

Catch­phras­es abound, and I remem­ber Alec and I glee­ful­ly repeat­ing them ad infini­tum: “I’m not a num­ber, I’m a free man!”, “Be see­ing you” and the glo­ri­ous­ly lib­er­tar­i­an “I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or num­bered!”. The lat­ter phrase I had embla­zoned on a t‑shirt bought from the gift shop at Port­meiri­on in North Wales, where The Pris­on­er was filmed and which I vis­it­ed on pil­grim­age in 1987.

Let’s enjoy the open­ing cred­its, enhanced by the excel­lent sound­track from Ron Grain­er.

Num­ber Six

 

Edwin Landseer’s The Monarch Of The Glen (1851)

Sir Edwin Land­seer (1802–1873) was a Lon­don-born painter and sculp­tor whose artis­tic tal­ents were recog­nised ear­ly on: at age thir­teen he exhib­it­ed works at the Roy­al Acad­e­my as an “Hon­orary Exhibitor” and was elect­ed as an Asso­ciate there at the min­i­mum age of twen­ty four. He was able to paint extreme­ly quick­ly and per­haps these days would have attract­ed a cool nick­name like snook­er play­ers Hur­ri­cane Hig­gins and Whirl­wind White (Light­ning Land­seer, per­haps); he was also reput­ed to be able to draw simul­ta­ne­ous­ly with both hands. One biog­ra­ph­er wrote:

…upon the occa­sion of a large par­ty assem­bled one evening at the house of a gen­tle­man in Lon­don, the con­ver­sa­tion hav­ing turned upon the sub­ject of feats of skill with the hand, one of the ladies present remarked that it would be impos­si­ble for any­one, how­ev­er skil­ful, to draw two things at once.
“Oh, I can do that,” said Land­seer qui­et­ly; “give me two pen­cils and I will show you.” The pen­cils were brought, and Land­seer, tak­ing one in each hand, drew simul­ta­ne­ous­ly and unhesi­tat­ing­ly the pro­file of a stag’s antlered head with one hand, and with the oth­er the per­fect out­line of the head of a horse.

Cer­tain­ly, Landseer’s renown stemmed from his paint­ings of ani­mals, par­tic­u­lar­ly hors­es, dogs and stags, although his most famous work is undoubt­ed­ly the set of four bronze lion sculp­tures at the base of Nelson’s Col­umn in Trafal­gar Square. Today’s sub­ject is prob­a­bly his next most famous work, though, being, as it is, the ulti­mate bis­cuit tin image of Scot­land: The Monarch of the Glen.

The Monarch of the Glen is an oil-on-can­vas paint­ing depict­ing a red deer stag, set against the steamy rugged hills of the Scot­tish High­lands. It was com­plet­ed in 1851 as part of a series of three pan­els intend­ed to hang in the Refresh­ment Rooms of the House of Lords, although that com­mis­sion nev­er came off due to some dis­pute or oth­er and it was sold into pri­vate own­er­ship. It also, how­ev­er, sold wide­ly in repro­duc­tions and became one of the most pop­u­lar paint­ings of the 19th cen­tu­ry. It prob­a­bly helped that Queen Vic­to­ria was a big fan.

The paint­ing was pur­chased in 1916 by the Pears soap com­pa­ny and this kicked off the Monarch’s career in adver­tis­ing. It was sold on to John Dewar & Sons dis­tillery and became their trade­mark before sim­i­lar­ly being used by Glen­fid­dich on their whisky bot­tles. A deriv­a­tive of the Monarch graced the shelves of Har­rods and Fort­num & Mason via the cans of Bax­ter’s Roy­al Game Soup, and of course, as implied, it adorned many a tin of short­bread bis­cuits. In 2017, the paint­ing was final­ly sold by its last own­er Dia­geo to the Nation­al Muse­um of Scot­land in Edin­burgh, where it can now be viewed by the pub­lic in all its majesty.

The stag has twelve points on his antlers, which in deer ter­mi­nol­o­gy makes him a “roy­al stag” not a “monarch stag”, for which six­teen points are need­ed, but let’s not quib­ble; he’s a mag­nif­i­cent beast.

The Monarch of the Glen

Rupert Brooke’s The Soldier (1915)

I recent­ly stayed for a few days in the charm­ing vil­lage of Red­mar­ley d’Abitot in Glouces­ter­shire and when research­ing the local area was pleas­ant­ly sur­prised to find that the near­by vil­lage of Dymock was sig­nif­i­cant in poet­ry cir­cles for being the home of the epony­mous Dymock Poets (as well as being the home of the Dymock Red cider apple and also Stink­ing Bish­op cheese!). A vis­it ensued and in its church of St Mary’s I found a dis­play about the Dymock Poets and learnt a bit more.

They were a lit­er­ary group of poets who lived in or around Dymock, or vis­it­ed often, and were active in the peri­od from 1911 to the First World War. Cen­tred around Las­celles Abercrombie’s house The Gal­lows, in near­by Ryton (that I sub­se­quent­ly vis­it­ed and had a nice chat with the cur­rent own­er who told me she gets plen­ty of Amer­i­can and Chi­nese lit­er­ary tourists), the group com­prised Aber­crom­bie, Robert Frost (whose poem The Road Not Tak­en I wrote about here), Rupert Brooke, Edward Thomas, Wil­frid Wil­son Gib­son and John Drinkwa­ter.

The group pub­lished their own quar­ter­ly, titled New Num­bers, and it was in this that we first saw Rupert Brooke’s The Sol­dier pub­lished: a poem which was to gain world­wide fame for its sim­ple and affect­ing ‘noble fall­en sol­dier’ motif, and be recit­ed in a thou­sand-fold war memo­ri­als. Whilst a lot of war poet­ry such as Wil­frid Owen’s Dulce et Deco­rum Est (also blogged about, here) had a dis­cernibly real­is­tic view of war, Brooke’s The Sol­dier was dia­met­ri­cal­ly oppo­site: a roman­ti­cised and  sen­ti­men­tal view, speak­ing in unabashed tones of pride, courage, and sac­ri­fice. It was writ­ten near the start of the First World War, per­haps before Brookes had time to sam­ple the bru­tal real­i­ties of bat­tle.

Indeed, he nev­er would: sail­ing with the British Mediter­ranean Expe­di­tionary Force on its way to the Gal­lipoli land­ings in 1915, he devel­oped strep­to­coc­cal sep­sis from an infect­ed mos­qui­to bite and, whilst moored off the Greek island of Sky­ros, died of sep­ti­caemia on 23rd April . As the expe­di­tionary force had orders to depart imme­di­ate­ly, Brooke was buried in an sim­ple olive grove on Sky­ros. It makes the open­ing lines of his poem all the more poignant.

If I should die, think only this of me:
That there’s some cor­ner of a for­eign field
That is for ever Eng­land. There shall be
In that rich earth a rich­er dust con­cealed;
A dust whom Eng­land bore, shaped, made aware,
Gave, once, her flow­ers to love, her ways to roam,
A body of Eng­land’s, breath­ing Eng­lish air,
Washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.
And think, this heart, all evil shed away,
A pulse in the eter­nal mind, no less
Gives some­where back the thoughts by Eng­land giv­en;
Her sights and sounds; dreams hap­py as her day;
And laugh­ter, learnt of friends; and gen­tle­ness,
In hearts at peace, under an Eng­lish heav­en.

Rupert Brooke

Key and Peele’s Substitute Teacher sketches (2012)

I came across the com­e­dy duo Key & Peele just pri­or to Jor­dan Peele’s direc­to­r­i­al career blow­ing up with the release of his films Get Out (2017), Us (2019) and, just last month, Nope. I have seen the first two of those movies, and they are intrigu­ing, slick psy­cho­log­i­cal hor­ror films, but it’s his com­e­dy with part­ner Kee­gan-Michael Key that inter­ests us here. The two first worked togeth­er on Amer­i­can sketch com­e­dy series Mad TV but broke out with their own series on Com­e­dy Cen­tral.

Key and Peele are black Amer­i­cans and their sketch­es often focus on eth­nic stereo­types and social awk­ward­ness in race rela­tions but they are very fun­ny with it, and no more so than in their two Sub­sti­tute Teacher sketch­es. In these, Key plays Mr Gar­vey, an angry and intim­i­dat­ing sub­sti­tute teacher and vet­er­an of inner-city school­ing, who has come to teach a class of white, mild-man­nered sub­ur­ban stu­dents.

Since Mr Gar­vey is pre­sum­ably used to teach­ing kids with first names hav­ing every spelling and pro­nun­ci­a­tion under the sun, he strug­gles with the reg­u­lar spellings and pro­nun­ci­a­tions of these white kids’ names: when tak­ing the class roll he pro­nounces Jacque­line as “Jay-kwellin”, Blake as “Balarkay”, Denise as “Dee-nice” and Aaron as “A‑A-Ron”. Any attempt­ed cor­rec­tion is seen as an affront and there’s no way he’s going to take it, so he forces them to acknowl­edge them­selves by his incor­rect pro­nun­ci­a­tions and threat­ens to send them to Prin­ci­pal O’Shaughnessy’s office (whose name he pro­nounces “O‑Shag-hen­nessy”).

The con­cept of Sub­sti­tute Teacher is very clever and Key absolute­ly nails his char­ac­ter. With excel­lent con­tri­bu­tions from the sup­port­ing cast of stu­dents whose names are so amus­ing­ly man­gled, it’s very, very fun­ny. “You done messed up, A‑A-Ron!”

Sub­sti­tute Teacher, Mr Gar­vey

Plato’s Allegory Of The Cave (c.375 BC)

Any­one who has stud­ied phi­los­o­phy to any rea­son­able degree will be famil­iar with the “Father” of phi­los­o­phy, Pla­to (c.428–348 BC). Along with this teacher, Socrates, and his stu­dent, Aris­to­tle, Pla­to under­pins the canon of ancient Greek phi­los­o­phy and, descend­ing from that, the entire his­to­ry of West­ern and Mid­dle East­ern phi­los­o­phy to this day. Alfred North White­head summed up Plato’s endur­ing influ­ence by char­ac­ter­is­ing the whole of sub­se­quent phi­los­o­phy as “a series of foot­notes to Pla­to”.

Pla­to inno­vat­ed the so-called dialec­tic method of rea­son­ing by way of dia­logues between two or more char­ac­ters (one of them often being his old teacher Socrates him­self) in order to tease out the truth about some­thing. Plato’s Socrates turns many an inter­locu­tor on his head with his acute rea­son­ing, and he’s also a dab hand with alle­gories: his most famous being found in Plato’s Repub­lic and known as the Alle­go­ry of the Cave.

In this alle­go­ry Socrates describes a group of pris­on­ers who live their lives chained to the wall of a cave, and fac­ing a blank wall. The pris­on­ers see only shad­ows pro­ject­ed on the wall by objects pass­ing in front of a fire behind them. The shad­ows are the pris­on­ers’ real­i­ty, but are not accu­rate rep­re­sen­ta­tions of the real world; they are mere­ly frag­ments of real­i­ty. Socrates explains that a philoso­pher is one who seeks to under­stand and per­ceive the high­er lev­els of real­i­ty and is like the pris­on­er who is freed from the cave and who comes to under­stand that the shad­ows on the wall are not the direct source of the images seen.

There is a thread run­ning between this ancient alle­go­ry right up to mod­ern times as sci­ence grap­ples with the fun­da­men­tal make­up of real­i­ty and the pos­si­bil­i­ty of high­er dimen­sions but we needn’t tax our­selves with such deep mat­ters right now. Instead, enjoy this excel­lent clay ani­ma­tion short which sum­maris­es the alle­go­ry nice­ly and is the work of writer and direc­tor Michael Ram­say, clay­ma­tion artist John Grigs­by and voice actor Kristo­pher Hut­son.

Pla­to’s Cave

Caspar David Friedrich’s Wanderer Above The Sea Of Fog (1818)

Back in 2016 when I intro­duced this blog (here) and the sense of the “sub­lime” as some­thing of excel­lence “occa­sion­al­ly glimpsed” here­in, I men­tioned that the con­cept of the sub­lime was one with a long his­to­ry of being debat­ed by artists and writ­ers over the cen­turies. I can pad that idea out a bit now, since it has a direct con­nec­tion to the sub­ject of this week’s blog, and so for fun and edi­fi­ca­tion, here’s a lit­tle pot­ted his­to­ry or mini-essay on the con­cept of the sub­lime.

The first known study of the con­cept was the 1st cen­tu­ry AD trea­tise On The Sub­lime, ascribed to Long­i­nus and which talks about the use of great or lofty lan­guage, intend­ed to inspire awe or ven­er­a­tion, in the field of rhetoric. This trea­tise was redis­cov­ered in the 16th cen­tu­ry and trans­lat­ed into Eng­lish and French in the fol­low­ing decades, and it had a sig­nif­i­cant influ­ence on lit­er­ary crit­i­cism and the phi­los­o­phy of aes­thet­ics in the 17th and 18th cen­turies.

The con­cept was devel­oped in Britain in the ear­ly 18th cen­tu­ry and came to describe an aes­thet­ic qual­i­ty in nature dis­tinct from beau­ty, brought into promi­nence by the writ­ings of John Den­nis (1693), Joseph Addi­son (1705) and Antho­ny Ash­ley-Coop­er (1709). All three of these authors had under­tak­en a cross­ing of the Alps, as part of that famil­iar Enlight­en­ment pas­time the “Grand Tour”, and all three inde­pen­dent­ly expressed their con­trast­ing feel­ings of fear and plea­sure at the awe­some­ness of nature and derived, as Addi­son described it, “an agree­able kind of hor­ror”.

Edmund Burke more for­mal­ly devel­oped this con­cep­tion of sub­lim­i­ty in A Philo­soph­i­cal Enquiry into the Ori­gin of Our Ideas of the Sub­lime and Beau­ti­ful in 1756, and Ger­man philoso­phers Kant, Schopen­hauer, Hegel and Rudolf Otto each added their aca­d­e­m­ic heft to the sub­ject. Soon, the con­cept would be realised in the art move­ment known as Roman­ti­cism and we would see the por­tray­al of land­scape in an entire­ly new man­ner: not just a visu­al­i­sa­tion of the sim­ple enjoy­ment of a beau­ti­ful view, as in the clas­sic con­cep­tion, but rather an exam­i­na­tion of a reunion with the spir­i­tu­al self through the con­tem­pla­tion of nature and its majes­tic pow­er.

Ger­man artist Cas­par David Friedrich (1774–1840) was instru­men­tal in cre­at­ing this notion of a land­scape full of roman­tic feel­ing: die roman­tis­che Stim­mungs­land­schaft. Friedrich’s paint­ings com­mon­ly employed the Rück­en­fig­ur, a per­son seen from behind, con­tem­plat­ing the land­scape and invit­ing the view­er to sim­i­lar­ly place him­self in that medi­um and expe­ri­ence the sub­lime poten­tial of nature. The Friedrich paint­ing that is above all used to char­ac­terise this con­cept is his 1818 oil on can­vas, Wan­der­er above the Sea of Fog.

It depicts a man stand­ing upon a rocky precipice and gaz­ing out across a land­scape cov­ered in a thick sea of fog through which oth­er ridges, trees, and moun­tains pierce. It is con­sid­ered one of the mas­ter­pieces of the Roman­ti­cism move­ment and to suc­cess­ful­ly evoke the sub­lime or Addis­on’s “agree­able hor­ror”.

Cas­par David Friedrich, Wan­der­er above the Sea of Fog

Commentaries on excellence in art, music, film, and literature